http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article5661291.eceThe United States government has threatened to withhold intelligence cooperation with the UK if evidence of the alleged torture of a ‘terrorist’ detainee at Guantanamo Bay is made public.
Details of how a British resident held in the detention camp was allegedly tortured and what UK intelligence knew about it must remain secret because of the US threats, the High Court ruled today.
Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones said lawyers for the Foreign Secretary had told them that the threat by the United States still applied under President Barack Obama's Administration.
The startling disclosure that the US has threatened to re-evaluate sharing intelligence with Britain came just a day after Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, lavished praise on the “special relationship” between the two countries.
In spite of noting that it is completely contrary to the rule of law not to release the evidence, the judges said it must remain secret otherwise “the public of the United Kingdom would be put at risk”.
Binyam Mohamed, a British resident held at the American base, has launched a High Court challenge in London seeking documents detailing his treatment to be made public.
But the two High Court judges said ruled that David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, had said that releasing the evidence could lead to America “revaluating” its intelligence sharing with the “real risk that it would reduce the intelligence provided”.
The judges added: ”It was and remains (so far as we are aware) the judgement of the Foreign Secretary that the United States government might carry out that threat and this would seriously prejudice the national security of the United Kingdom.”
Today's ruling discloses that the secret documents at the centre of the case - seven paragraphs amounting to 25 lines - “give rise to an arguable case of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” against Mohamed.
It is also said that a British intelligence official may have been present when Mohamed alleges he was tortured.
The judgement raises the prospect of criminal charges being brought against British officials.
David Davis, the former shadow home secretary, called for the Government to explain exactly what had happened.