Measures to tackle alcohol abuse by stopping cut-price offers have been outlined by the Scottish Government.
It has proposed a range of measures including the radical step of a minimum price per unit. It would be the first country in Europe to take the step.
The minority government said it also plans to ban discount deals on alcohol.
SNP ministers backed down from raising the age buying drink from off-sales to 21 - but will create powers for that to be imposed on a local basis.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7917824.stmThoughts? The minimum price they've suggested is 40p per unit (ie 10ml of pure alcohol); that works out at £4.22 for a 6x440ml pack of 4.4% lager; or £3.90 for a 13% bottle of wine. That latter price is a little more than I often pay for wine, so I'm obviously a cheapskate.
Since this would be more than the current prices for the cheap end of the market, would it then push up prices in that and the slightly more upscale prices too? And who would get the extra profit? I'd worry that the supermarkets would demand wholesale prices kept low, so they'd get profit; and the breweries/other producers would try to make it up by making their prices higher for smaller retailers.
Would an increase in alcohol duty be a more equitable way of achieving this - and getting the money into government pockets, rather than big business?