Though they admitted this last year - an interview with the shadow culture secretary Jeremy Hunt:
One point of difference between the main parties on broadcasting is the Conservatives' idea that non-public service news services should be freed from rules on impartiality. With video-rich websites already operated by newspapers, and what the shadow media minister regards as a blurring of edges between digital TV and IPTV, he thinks the case for having a range of opinionated news channels in a free society is self evident.
Would he object if Sky News morphed into a UK version of Fox News? “It is not going to happen. Sky News knows that audiences want it to remain an impartial news channel. It is not pushing to relax the impartiality requirement because it's very happy with it.”
But would it matter if Rupert Murdoch owned two TV news channels in Britain? “The important thing is not whether a particular owner owns another TV channel but to make sure you have a variety of owners with a variety of TV channels so that no one owner has a dominant position both commercially and politically.
“Rather than worry about Rupert Murdoch owning another TV channel, what we should recognise is that he has probably done more to create variety and choice in British TV than any other single person because of his huge investment in setting up Sky TV which, at one point, was losing several million pounds a day.
“We would be the poorer and wouldn't be saying that British TV is the envy of the world if it hadn't been for him being prepared to take that commercial risk. We need to encourage that kind of investment.”
http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/interview-jeremy-hunt/1797590.articleWow - what a brown-noser. There will indeed be big trouble for British TV if Hunt is allowed to get his hands on the culture portfolio in government. Murdoch's contribution to British TV has consisted of expensive sport channels. To credit him with making British TV 'the best in the world' is ridiculous.