Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In 1945 Labour believed in "useful work for all"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 07:28 AM
Original message
In 1945 Labour believed in "useful work for all"
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 07:29 AM by miscsoc
It's almost inconcievable to imagine a political party proposing that people had a right to useful, meaningful work in this day and age, but it was mainstream 65 years ago.

This just occured to me while watching Gideon give his budget statement, and I found it jarring and sad.
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. whoa this has like 200 views
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 07:37 AM by miscsoc
this is less due to my wise commentary than to some baffling idiosyncrasy of my ISP - everytime I click on the thread it goes up like 17 views.

edit: or 130 rather, a few seconds after i posted it. anyway the weird phenomenon has stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. When I go in
its only clicks up one. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maybe DU just engineered that in to recognise my genius
I am worth 17 men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-04-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. And at least 2 or 3 women.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am often reminded of a conversation I had with Denis Murphy Snr ....
... who was, for many years, a senior official of Northumberland NUM.

Although admitting that it was no Utopia, he reminisced that when he began work at Ashington Colliery, then one of the largest in the country, almost all males had assured, paid employment, even - his words not mine - "the dafties". In other words, even mentally-challenged men had "useful, meaningful" work with a pay packet to take home and a few bob for Saturday night out with the lads.

Now, they'd presumably seen as "shirkers" scrounging around on invalidity.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or if they did get a job it would be nothing worthwhile.
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 09:10 AM by miscsoc
I've read about how a lot of the miners laid off during the eighties were expected to get new service jobs. I can't really blame a middle aged ex-miner for considering a job flipping burgers or pouring cappucinos for stockbrokers or whatever to be beneath their dignity.

As for the "dafties", that guy you knew had a good point there. I mean we all knew a few people at school who weren't that bright. The people i knew like that are as far as I have heard in pretty dysfunctional lifestyles now - drugs, crime, etc. (They would have left school five years ago or so) Fifty years ago they would have probably been working at the mines down the road, and had some sort of structure to their lives and sense of purpose.

Of course a lot of people in that sort of job weren't in it by choice and were capable of much more - my parents were both pretty smart - actually very academically successful - but pressured into menial jobs by their parents.

The Tories consciously shunted people onto incapacity in order to make it seem like their policies caused less unemployment than they did. It is fucking rich for them now to complain that a lot of people on incapacity aren't really disabled - the reason those able bodied people are ON incapacity is that the government knew their new economy had no place for them and that the public would find that new economy morally repulsive if they were aware of its effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SydneyDundee Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Not sure what you are saying here?
are you implying that only certain people are 'worthy" of jobs in the service sector then? that there is a hierarchy of work that, no matter if it is honest and serves a purpose and gets rewarded fairly, that some work is beneath others?....

There is no honest and legal work that is beneath me if it means I can feed my family....and moreover my hat goes off to anyone else in 'less" worthy jobs..like "flipping burgers" etc......
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hopeless Romantic Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somehow I reckon that the 1945 definition of "useful work" would differ from some of todays
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-04-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I suppose so, but today's would have some relation to the 1945 one
We have however, dispensed with the idea of a right to useful labour altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-10 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. And Labour has dispensed with any interest in working people altogether.
Their next leader will almost certainly be the older Miliband, meaning there will be no deviation from the now-failed New Labour policies whatsoever at the next election.

Why so many Labourites want to stay with what can never work again is a bonafide mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Old habits die hard
> Why so many Labourites want to stay with what can never work again
> is a bonafide mystery.

There are so many people - especially the older generations - who will
simply vote for the same colour year in, year out, regardless of what
the candidates (or even the party as a whole) actually does in that time.

Guess it boils down to "thinking is hard work" ...?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realcrookswearsuits Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Full employment was the key stone of all post war government policies
right upto 1979. Both Labour and Conservative governments of the 1950s and 1960s saw it as a moral as well as a political imperative. The idea that you could dump people on the scrap heap without any prospect of escape was seen as creating a breeding ground for fascism and totalitarianism which had to be avoided at all costs. Looks like those lessons will have to be learnt all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. And now apparently
12.5% of the working population were not born here.

What I don't know is what percentage of the unemployed that were born here matches that figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tjwmason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Depends what you mean by "matches that figure"
It rather implies that if an immigrant comes to Britain and gets a job, then that removes a non-immigrant from that job who is thus unemployed - which is pure nonsense as economic theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Means occupies
no removes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC