Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diane Abbott accuses David Miliband of 'buying' Labour leadership contest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
Hopeless Romantic Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 10:13 AM
Original message
Diane Abbott accuses David Miliband of 'buying' Labour leadership contest
Diane Abbott today accused David Miliband of "buying" the Labour leadership contest.

The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington claimed the level of funding raised by the shadow foreign secretary has given him an unfair advantage in the race to succeed Gordon Brown.

The latest figures published by the Electoral Commission on 8 July show Miliband, who helped Abbott win the number of nominations needed to be in the contest, has raised by far the most money of the five contenders with £185,265, more than six times the amount raised by the second highest levels of funds, secured by Ed Balls.

In contrast, Abbott says she has raised just £1,700.

But Abbott claimed today that Miliband had in fact "£400,000 in cold cash" to drive through his leadership bid. "There is something unfortunate about even the appearance that someone is buying the election," said Abbott in a video interview for the Guardian.

A committee of Labour's ruling body set a cap of £156,000 for each leadership contender – equivalent to £1 for each party member registered at the time the contest began.

But Abbott pointed out that this cap excluded the cost of staff on which contenders rely to canvass Labour members for their votes.

She claimed Miliband has a 90-strong staff to support his campaign to the "two-and-half volunteers" helping her bid. "You do get very, very tired when you are facing those sorts of odds," said Abbott, who recently attacked Miliband for having "old Blairite money".

She said: "I think that we need a system for the leadership, much like our system when you are running at a constituency level, which doesn't allow people to buy elections."

Abbott said there was "no doubt" that the funding Miliband had to work with made a "huge difference" in the election. "He's already had a mail-out – no one else can afford to have a mail-out ... So he's got the money to have people to do the phone rounds, he's got the money to do the mail-outs, he's got the money to get those leaflets through, and he's got the money to roll around even in between the official hustings and make all these unofficial visits. There's no doubt that money is making a huge difference in the election."

Miliband is seen as frontrunner in the race due to his support base and the funding he has secured during the campaign, though his younger brother, Ed, is closing in, having secured more trade union support via the backing of the three largest trade unions in the country.

But the shadow climate change secretary is lagging way behind his brother in terms of funding. Latest donation levels registered by the Electoral Commission, published on 8 July, show he has £15,000 to support his campaign, putting him behind Balls, who has managed to raise £28,419.

Miliband's campaign office responded to Abbott's claims and a spokeswoman for Miliband said: "David makes no apology for being able to raise money which is what the Labour Party needs to be able to do in order to take on the Tories and fight Ashcroft's millions.

"Part of the money he has raised is going towards training community organisers. To date 1,000 people have signed up to be trained and over 500 have taken part in the training."

But she refused to be drawn on Abbott's claim that Miliband has more than doubled his donations since the last figures were published on 8 July, other than to say the campaign "is complying with all of the rules on financial spending in this contest".

The next set of donations secured by each contender will be published on 12 August. On Abbott's suggestion that Miliband has 90 members of staff to aid his campaign, the spokeswoman added:

"Obviously there are not 90 members of paid staff on the campaign but we have had around 450 volunteers who have generously given their time to the David Miliband for Leader Phone Bank."

A Labour party spokesperson said the leadership election rules ensure the candidates have fair and equitable access to members. "At the start of the campaign all candidates were issued with a code of conduct clearly explaining the rules and the cap on campaign spending. The party offers all candidates equal opportunity to write, email and telephone Labour party members through our national printers, email system and telephone banks. At the request of all candidates, the Labour party has issued every campaign team with a nationwide list of party members' names and telephone numbers."

Abbott set out her stall as the only candidate not to have served as a minister in a New Labour government. Asked in the Guardian interview which of the other contenders – David Miliband, Ed Miliband, Ed Balls and Andy Burnham – was closest to her politically, Abbott declined to comment, alluding only to their generic similarities: "I think all of them are very nice. Nice suits, nice red ties, nice haircuts. All very nice."

She issued a sideswipe at the previous Labour government, of which the other four contenders were part, blaming the former government's record on anti-terrorism legislation and civil liberties on "phoney populism".

"The party under New Labour was being thrown so far to the right they thought they needed to throw a bone to some of their core supporters – this kind of 'we're going to bang people up for 90 days and that will make you safe'," she said.

"It was a kind of phoney and slightly disreputable populism that led us into that and also we were led by the polls. We didn't talk to our members, to our councillors. We didn't offer leadership, we just looked to the polls. They said, 'Yes, bang up Muslim boys with rucksacks for 90 days without trial' and we said, 'Yes, we will do that.'"

She expressed concern that the former Labour government may be implicated in torture as a result of the government inquiry.

"The only reason the Tories are having this inquiry is they think the conclusion will be disadvantageous to us and the question is not whether we tortured people, or whether David Miliband tortured people, the question is: were we complicit, both in torture and in extraordinary renditions? I look at the facts, and the facts will come clear hopefully with the Tory inquiry, but maybe even before that."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/aug/02/diane-abbott-david-miliband-buying-labour-leadership
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nobody expects Diane Abbott to win...
...therefore nobody is willing to donate to her campaign.

To be perfectly honest though the Labour leadership contest has been a real snoozefest, with all but 1 of the candidates having nothing of any substance to say.

And while I'm on the subject, can I just say that I really do not like Andy Burnham. If he gets elected leader then we can kiss goodbye to any chance of Labour being a progressive party ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why would ANYONE in the Labour Party want David Miliband as leader?
His program is "keep everything exactly the same".

And keeping everything exactly the same is what reduced Labour to 29% at the last General Election-a far worse showing, in popular vote terms, than Neil Kinnock's 1987 result, (the result that supposed proved that Labour had to kick out the Left and stop defending the poor, the workers, and civil liberties if it ever wanted to win), and just barely above Michael Foot's 27% in 1983.

Why would any sane Labourite want to "Stay The Course"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I also have to say I think the antics in Sheffield
Birmingham and in other places were to stop the fall to below 27%. What justification would Neo Con Labour have if they ended up worse than in 1983?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're probably right about that.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. There's actually worse out there then David Miliband!
Andy Burnham is worst, and the most right-wing of the candidates. He's the candidate who would be the biggest disaster IMHO.

I'm not overly keen on Ed Balls either, and I do think that MP's who have only been in parliament 5 years are not ready for party leadership in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think that Ed Miliband is about the best of a lacklustre bunch ...
... and the least likely to give the New Labour brand any continued credence.

The Skin

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Depends what you mean by "least likely"
That said, it's not like there's all that much between them really. 4 loyal careerists who've been fasttracked into the cabinet and a left winger who doesn't have a hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think there is little danger of getting Burnham; he seems to be very much 'Andy Who?'
I actually rather like Balls, because I think that as an Education Secretary he was more competent than most. He is too right-wing for me, but so are most of them. But he is unpopular with the media (they really wanted him to lose his seat!) and stands no chance.

I do like Abbott but she stands even less of a chance.

I think it's essentially sewn up for D. Miliband. Not my favourite person, but seems better than either Blair or (certainly) Cameron. I just want the whole leadership battle to end, and for the Labour Party to get busy fighting the Tories rather than each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What WOULD be important would be to get the highest-possible first round vote for Diane Abbott
Even if she's not going to be the leader, her candidacy can be used to show that there's more support than the chattering idiots(sorry, classes)would expect for genuinely radical policies within Labour ranks. The more support that can be demonstrated, the greater the possibility that even Miliband the Elder would feel the need to make at least some concessiona to the Left, and to make the needed break with the New Labour status quo. Such a break is likely the only chance that Labour has of returning to power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC