from a six foot six drug 20 year old drug dealer. He'd have the right to stab her. Even if she's no danger to him whatsoever - because there's nothing in his example about personal danger, just burglary. Clarke is 'clear' that it's not a criminal offence. Looks like you will lose the right to life if you break into a house, if the Tories get their way.
But, hang on - it turns out Clarke himself admits it's not 'clear':
Mr Clarke said legal protection would not extend to anyone shooting a burglar in the back when they were fleeing or "getting their friends together to beat them up".
"We all know what we mean when we say a person has an absolute right to defend themselves and their home and reasonable force.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/uk-politics-13957587No, Clarke, you idiot, we don't 'all know' - because you've now made it unclear what you want to happen if the resident stabs someone who is fleeing. Is it the shooting that's wrong, or that they're fleeing? For a trained lawyer, he's particularly incompetent at being clear when talking about legal matters. 'Reasonable force' to defend property is very much a matter of opinion - some people may think stabbing someone making off with their laptop is perfectly reasonable; others may think monetary loss doesn't justify a life-threatening injury.