Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Milly Dowler officer removed over NoW leak complaint

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 04:04 AM
Original message
Milly Dowler officer removed over NoW leak complaint
Surrey Police removed an officer from the inquiry into Milly Dowler's murder after claims information was leaked to the News of the World, it has emerged.

The force has confirmed a detective was taken off the case after a complaint he had mishandled confidential data.

>

Surrey Police said the officer received "words of advice" over the complaint.

It said it had no evidence that the detective constable had passed any information to the News of the World, but that he had spoken about aspects of the investigation to a retired police officer friend.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-14266147

Sounds like there was some networking going on. Maybe this is part of the background to these issues. Notwithstanding moral issues retired police wouldn't be subject to the Data Protection Act etc which may be used in connection with charges on this subject and similar issues.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
fedsron2us Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
1.  The truth is much of the NOTW information was probably not 'hacked' at all.
It was obtained from corrupt insiders who had access to supposedly confidential information held on police computers. This illegal trade in private data that was originally obtained legitimately by the police, government departments and corporations is the biggest issue here. I wonder how far into this murky world the public enquiry into this scandal will venture. When is leaking data legitimate and if so what and by whom. If your and my personal data is not secure and protected then maybe there is an argument for opening up some IT systems so they are transparent to everyone. After all why should the state be the only one that knows who earns and owns what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes - "hacked" has become too convenient a handle
for some to latch on to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC