Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

North-south divide emerges over UK's best places to live

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:41 AM
Original message
North-south divide emerges over UK's best places to live
Programm's on tonight, but I doubt I'll be able to watch it so I'll leave you lot to mull over this article from the Independent. Make of this what you will.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article304653.ece

It is a league table that could see property prices spiral or fall, and will no doubt cause many proud locals to fill with joy or outrage.

The 10 best and worst places to live in the UK are to be named - and in some cases, shamed, on television tonight.

Three of the five most desirable places named in advance of the Channel 4 programme are in the south of England, while three of the worst areas are in the North.

Experts pointed out that the qualities that make a place attractive to move to are more nebulous than crime rates and GCSE passes.

Here are the three best ones picked out by the Independent

ASHFORD, KENT
GUILDFORD, SURREY
HARROGATE, YORKSHIRE

And three of the worst

EASINGTON, CO DURHAM
HACKNEY, EAST LONDON
MERTHYR TYDFIL, WALES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guy_Montag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is Easington not in Tony's constituency? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No it isn't. Sedgefield is further South and West in County Durham.
Tony's North has more in common with Harrogate than it has with Easington.

Easington, like Ashington where I live, had the guts taken out of its economy when Thatcher decided that it would be a Jolly Good Wheeze to dish the NUM by destroying the Coal Industry.

The old Coalfield areas are struggling like hell to diversify but as most of the investment and transport infrastructure is in the South East they're largely pissing against the wind.

Never mind, I'm sure the programme will cheer them up tremendously. Perhaps some will be motivated to Get On Their Bikes and bicycle through the country lanes to A Better Life in Kent.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Depressing suburban petit bourgeois choices.
I'd rather live in Hackney than Ashford (a dump) or Guildford any day.

But Harrogate is lovely, if a bit blue rinse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Well if it's of any comfort
I think that Westminster did very well in this survey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's true, number two no less.
But which part of Westminster did they mean? Belgravia? Pimlico? Soho? Little Riyadh? The council estates that dot Pimlico and Marylebone?

Your neck of the wood did well also, didn't it? You're down Epsom way - or am I wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. No
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 06:33 AM by Thankfully_in_Britai
I'm in Essex, not Epsom, Ewell, Egham or anywhere else in Surrey. :-)

The nearest places to me the program mentioned were Hertfordshire and Hackney, at two very different ends of the scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Missed the programme, but I've looked at the website now
I see my parents' house is sandwiched between the numbers 6 and 7 desirable areas - South Cambs and East Herts. Good for the house price, I suppose (they did pay quite a lot, 5 years ago), but I can't say the area is that special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lockdown Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hit the North!
Flamewar anyone?

(joke!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipling Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yorkshire got one in. I ain't complaining.
And Surrey and Kent are mostly nice.

As for the worst: County Durham is horrific in parts, I'll admit. Bishop Auckland and the surrounding area especially. Hackney is basically a ghetto, so fair enough. Merthyr Tydfil... er... sounds Welsh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed.
And I'm also surprised that they would think even to consider Yorkshire since the North is usually ignored in these kinds of league tables, something I've never understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Parts of County Durham are "Horrific"?
Please define. Horrific as in Black Country? Horrific as in Lea Valley? Horrific as in Margate? Horrific as in Blackpool seafront?

I didn't watch the programme as I've no interest in this kind of silly-season beauty contest stuff. But I hear that my old Alma Mater Hull was declared the worst and I thoroughly enjoyed living there so I guess that everywhere else must be pretty wonderful.

Meanwhile, I'm more than happy with where I live and I don't need it to be in anyone else's Top Ten.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipling Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Similar to the Black Country in many ways.
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 07:50 AM by Kipling
But with less of a spirit of unity and pride. Poor, tough communities that were bad before Thatcher moved in and have only gone downhill. Unemployment booming, best workers leaving, drunken assaults every night, schools a mess, etc. I have cousins who live in a village/small town there - believe me, it's nasty. Less of a village, more a lump of run-down inner city plonked down on a moor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. "And Surrey and Kent are mostly nice."
Indeed, "nice" they are. And parts of Cornwall, Scotland, Wales, Cumbria and Northumberland are heart-stoppingly beautiful.

But I don't think that that's what this was all about.

The skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipling Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. By "nice" I mean...
Impressively middle-class, picturesque, quiet retirement zones. The sort of place that would get chosen for a show like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. The only entry not in the South-East
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 07:08 AM by Thankfully_in_Britai
in the best 10 was Harrogate. Other then that it all seems to be about Surrey, Surrey and Surrey. Make of that what you will.

As to Hull being the worst, well there is a book out entitled "Crap Towns" which also has Hull as being the worst place to live in Britain. I remember that book well as here in Essex we used it to make fun of South Woodham Ferrers quite a bit.

They brought out spin offs of that book, notably Crap Towns II, Crap Cars and Crap Jobs but I think they've flogged that dead horse quite well enough for the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't consider Co. Durham a bad place to live
It's a mixed picture. The cost of living is cheap here, especially housing.

The main problems we do have revolve around the lack of well-paid jobs which depresses the local service economy in turn.

The local school's GCSE pass rate is pretty average, but I don't think it helps that many good students don't feel like they can make the most of their own endeavours due to the low local wages.

I live just 3 miles from Bishop Auckland and crime is comparatively low in my town (Shildon), which is quite remarkable considering the economic deprivation there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » United Kingdom Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC