Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did the Howard government choose Sydney for Cheney's visit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 08:24 PM
Original message
Why did the Howard government choose Sydney for Cheney's visit.
Doesn't it sound ludicrous to you that instead of holding so-called talks with Cheney in Canberra, they chose to cause massive disruptions in Sydney. I was in Sydney on Friday and witnessed helicopters hovering overhead, about 1 out of 10 cars were police cars and many streets were closed down.

The Harbour Bridge was closed to traffic yesterday so that Cheney and Howard could have drinks on the lawn of Kirribilli House.

When you think about it. What was the point of Cheney's visit anyway. Surely a simple phone call would have covered everything that they would have had to say.

Could anyone tell me how I would go about finding out how much this visit by the worlds most notorious war criminal has cost the Australian taxpayer?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Esra Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Canberra would have made more sense. Maybe Howard
finds it easier to pose in Sydney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hopefully it may come back to haunt him in the next federal election
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did Howard choose Sydney, or did Cheney?
It seems it's the Americans driving this visit, as they do everything. And it was their security
guys taking over and giving orders to ours.

It was completely over the top, and can't have been the source of any goodwill towards Cheney or the
US. People were just mad about the disruption, and the only excited person was Howard.

In reality, he could have slipped quietly into Sydney and nobody would have noticed or cared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Do you think that the Cheney visit
has made Howard a little nervous about holding APEC meeting in Sydney later in the year? He's looking like a very nervous little man lately, especially since Maxine Mckew has thrown her hat in the ring. I'm just loving these mind games Rudd and the crew are playing on him lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think Howard likes to bask in the reflected glory of others,
but his values system is so flawed that he can't see when their gloss is only illusion.

I heard the little runt a few minutes ago praising George Miller for winning an Oscar for Happy Feet,
one again, trying to cash in on other people's achievements. In ten years, his government has done
nothing at all to foster Australian film and television, and our production rate is lower than it
has been since the early seventies. The Australian film industry is struggling badly, but this
little rat is trying to make out that he's somehow responsible for any success that is achieved in
spite of him.

Maxine McKew certainly caught everybody on the hop - didn't see that one coming at all. I just don't
know how seriously to take it. I think she's too smart to allow herself to be used by Labor, so is
she for real, or as you said, just messing with Howard's head?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maxine McKew is not new to politics
Bob Hogg has been her partner for many years. Unless the Liberal Party slime machine unearth some past indiscretions, she is in a "no lose" situation. Its all part of playing mind games with Howard. Its just another front that he is being attacked from.

If she doesnt win the seat off him in the next election, it will be good practice for when there is a by election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. She's brave, intelligent and good-looking too,
all things Howard is not.

I think it is more about messing with Howard's head though - if she was just keen to get into
Parliament, I think she'd have waited for a safer seat.

But she has a lot of goodwill, and even if she just makes a good dent in his numbers, he's going to
look vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
gemini_liberal Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah pretty impressive security for someone who's powers are completely reserve...
Seriously, it's the Vice President for heaven's sake - unless the President dies or there's a tie in the Senate, he's useless! Heck, the Governor-General has more duties than the VP.

besides, I am certain that bullets are scared of Dick Cheney!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Esra Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Except for the fact that Cheney is the "Grand Poobah". His
glove puppet would not dare do anything without uncle Dicky's approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Cheney's visit certainly didn't win any new friends for him
or for the Bush Administration. People started out mostly indifferent, and ended up angry at the
traffic holdups and Bridge closing.

Obviously it was all about dirty deeds with Howard - more troops, perhaps, and a desperate plea from
Howard to do something about David Hicks before the election?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC