|
I think I know what Rudd is doing - not giving Howard any wedge issues that will allow him to get stuck into Labor - at least I hope that's what it is. Because Rudd seems to be doing a Beazley lately, jumping up and crying "me too" on every piece of Howard legislation.
It goes without saying that I look forward to the political demise of John Howard, but I'm not quite sure what we will get with a Rudd Labor Government. Will he take Labor a bit further to the left once he's elected, or will we really just get Howard-lite?
I'm well aware that Latham's policies cost him the Tasmanian vote, but complete support of the Gunns' pulp mill is still a huge worry. Rudd has also backed in full Howard's anti-terror legislation, and the full privatisation of Telstra. Not to mention full support for Government intervention in Aboriginal affairs in the N.T. - even the five-year takeover of Aboriginal land. And this week we saw him endorse Howard's support for the death penalty for the Bali bombers. You are either for the death penalty or against it, and you can't say it's okay for a group of Muslim terrorists but not for Australian drug dealers. This was just a piece of political opportunism on Howard's part, aiming straight for the emotions of a non-thinking section of the public. To hear Rudd endorse Howard's call has really made me wonder whether this otherwise highly intelligent political animal really stands for anything at all except a desire to win.
I was hoping he'd give me a reason to vote FOR something, not just against Howard, but I don't think it's going to happen. Sad.
|