Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think after the State Conference for the Labor Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU
 
Aussie leftie Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:06 AM
Original message
I think after the State Conference for the Labor Party
this may be the beginning of the end for Iemma and Costa. They were not only union members there as delegates, there were also mostly Labor Party delegates representing their SEC's and FEC's. Iemma and Costa were beaten 7-1 in the vote against privatizing the power industry. You cannot ignore a result like that and expect the status qua.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Part of the problem with Costa is that he doesn't care what anybody thinks.
He's stated openly that he's looking to move into the private sector
(following Bob Carr into a cushy job with Macquarie as a reward for
doing right by them?). He's a really ugly person, and only has power
because his mate Alan Jones put pressure on the pathetic Carr to make
him Police Minister. When he'd stuffed that up, he moved to Transport
and stuffed that as well. Now as Treasurer he's stuffing everything and
everybody, and he just doesn't give a shit. I've never seen anything
like his screaming and swearing at the Conference - unbelievable.

The unions are threatening to kick both Costa and Iemma out of the Labor
Party if they go ahead - they could still be MPs as Independents, but
couldn't be members of the government any longer, because it was Labor
who was called on to form government, not any individuals. That would
really be something to see - I don't think it's ever happened before.
But by then, the damage could be done, and Costa for sure won't back
down, whatever they do.

Rudd is going to put a referendum to us at the next election, that fixed
four-year terms be introduced federally. I can't think of a better
argument against it than what is currently happening in NSW. We're stuck
with them for another three years, and we can't do anything about it.
And the alternative is just as bad, if not worse. It's enough to make
anarchy seem attractive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC