|
Edited on Tue May-11-10 10:35 PM by Matilda
but not by much.
Prior to Rudd's dumping of an ETS scheme, not just for now, but for the life of the next parliament, he was set to win by the roughly the same majority he had in 2007. He's now losing the primary votes in the Lower House, but they're not flowing diretly to the Coalition, they're going to minor parties and the Greens. Some will come back to Labor, and some will go to the Coalition, and his majority in the Lower House, on current polling, will be cut by a couple of seats. I can't see why this would change; the Budget is a pragmatic one for the government, but it's not promising anything directly to the voters.
It's the Senate, as always, that's going to be interesting. There is a lot of anger over the ditching of the ETS, and that will see an increase in the votes going to the Greens. A half-Senate election would probably bring the Greens six seats, but the Coalition would still have the numbers to defeat the government until July 2011. A double dissolution would bring more seats to the Greens - Antony Green thinks they could get eight seats, and he's so often right on the money - but the Coalition's stranglehold would be broken immediately. But Rudd refused even to discuss the question of a double dissolution this morning, and who knows what's in his mind? Whatever Rudd decides, Labor is not going to have full control of the Senate. We Munchkins can only wait and see.
|