Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

73-72: government loses first vote in house with pregnant Plibersek absent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:09 PM
Original message
73-72: government loses first vote in house with pregnant Plibersek absent
Federal Parliament has passed a package of changes to its own rules and procedures, but only after the government lost its first vote, with pregnant Labor minister Tanya Plibersek absent from the chamber.

Ironically, a division over how to deal with divisions in which an MP inadvertently misses a vote was won by the opposition by a single vote.

However, the rest of a package of changes, which the government proclaimed "a great day for parliamentary reform", was passed without controversy.

The opposition, while supporting most of the measures, successfully amended an aspect that could be crucial in a Parliament of knife-edge numbers.

Manager of opposition business Christopher Pyne said the government had reneged on an agreement to hold a debate on a vote being held again if a member inadvertently missed the first vote.

Mr Pyne moved an amendment to the package to require a debate to suspend standing orders so the house could decide if the missed vote was genuine misadventure.

More: http://www.smh.com.au/national/7372-government-loses-first-vote-in-house-with--pregnant-plibersek-absent-20100929-15wqn.html

I have a feeling that we're in for some interesting times in Canberra for the next couple of years.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. At least the loss was due to the Independents (Oakeshott, Windsor)
voting with the Coalition, and not because the Opposition refused to provide a pair for Tanya Plibersek. I bet they'd have liked to refuse, but they'd have had the women's lobby to answer to on that one.

Amusing that the one pollie who was late for Question Time was Bob Katter - I bet if it was a vote, the Opposition would be using cattle prods to get him there on time, or they'd pay the price for their own intransigence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Katter's unreliable in more ways than one
His vote was one of those which elevated Slippery Pete to Deputy Speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. And meanwhile, a Liberal MP says that a death could see the Coalition take power.
Federal Liberal MP Don Randall said in Parliament today:

"We're only one death, one desertion and one sickness away from the ability to change the composure of this House," he said.

"We'll be doing our best to keep this Government to account and if that opportunity arises it'll be fantastic."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/09/30/3026131.htm?section=justin


Apparently he's never heard the expression "tempting fate". If one of their number dies, they'll be well and truly f****d.

What an ugly lot they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC