|
First of all, I want to clear up that if you read Keith's post and from all that I've heard it is clear that Bev was scheduled to go on Nov 8 and MSNBC, NOT BEV, wanted to reschedule. That is why he said,
"But we didn’t cancel on her - we wanted, on that first night raising this touchy subject nobody else had previously covered, to have more mainstream guests. And we wanted her back another night."
As if to say it wasn't to cancel, but to reschedule.
I, too, find it odd that Bev can't show the poll tapes that were thrown in the trash and show the difference between them and the copies she received. HOWEVER, have you watched MSM lately? The more I think of it I can imagine several reasons NOT to. It might not be in our self interest right now.
My suggestion to everyone is to keep in mind what Bev has been doing for the past 2 years. She has been on this issue for a while now and I have a hard time believing that she doesn't take this issue seriously. I don't think Howard Dean would have listened to her if she was just some kook, and the fact is, SHE ISN'T. She deserves the benefit of the doubt.
As for Keith: Yes, he has done us a great service. But he has only just started ccovering the BBV issue these last couple weeks and that hardly makes him a crusader. Remember that his boss, NBC, is about as crooked as they come and VERY republican. I see no reason to throw so much trust their way. It would be very easy for them to use her appearance in a harmful way to us. Editing does wonders, and guess who does the editing.
One more thing, I found it interesting that Keith said HE hasn't spoke to Bev, but his staff has. Why is that? I think he deserves some scrutiny too.
|