Why hasn't the FBI impounded ALL BB voting machines? With

[lthuedk]

the publication and wide distribution of evidence of massive election fraud, their show of duty-or the lack of it-is troubling. Who are they serving; their country or the "boss?"

I'd be glad to pick up as many black boxes here in Riverside County, Ca, as my truck can hold and deliver them to Mr. Mueller. That is, if there's a manpower shortage.

[bowens43]

1. The FBI works for the administration.

[lthuedk]

2. Would that imply complicity?

[aquart]

3. Silly question.

[lthuedk]

7. This silly question should be directed at Mr. Mueller by the MSM.

Hasn't probable cause been adequately established? Wouldn't inaction by law enforcement be negligent?

[indy_azcat]

11. it's not like Mueller hasn't been a whitewasher before

such as:
http://www.americanfreepress.net/08_22_01/New_FBI_Head_Is_Old_Bush_Cover/new_fbi_head_is_old_bush_cover.html

[unpossibles]

4. "Why hasn't the FBI impounded ALL BB voting machines?"

because they are still being scrubbed clean?

[geo]

6. They would need a warrant/court order to have the authority...

Hi all,

I played host to a thread on this, and saw at least one other at the time. We were discussing the merits of using the Fair Claims Act, RICO and/or criminal investigations to get the boxes locked down.

Hope that help. :)

- G

[lthuedk]

8. Hi Geo

Just trying to keep the obvious alive. Since the publication of the Clint Curtis Affidavit, the requirement of probable cause would seem to have been established.

[Helga Scow Stern]

5. Because they are busy hiding in their offices awaiting Rove's order's?

http://www.wbai.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=4340

FBI Refuses Complaint Alleging Ohio Voter Fraud
(by Don DeBar, Dec 3, 2004) The White Plains office of the FBI today refused to accept a complaint detailing allegations of compound felonies of voter fraud, conspiracy and other offenses in connection with the Ohio conduct of last month's presidential election.

A group of election activists called Transparent Democracy - including civil rights attorney Michael Sussman, Greenburgh town supervisor Paul Feiner, and four others - attempted to present the complaint at noon today while dozens of protestors carried signs outside supporting the call for an investigation.

The smaller group was denied access to the FBI's Westchester offices at 222 Bloomingdale Road in White Plains. Organizer Nicholas Mottern had previously arranged with the office to present the complaint. However, when they arrived in the building's lobby, he and the others were informed by building security that the FBI had instructed management not to allow them access to the Bureau's offices, and that the FBI would not send a representative down to the desk to accept the complaint.

In response to the Bureau's action, Sussman, Feiner and Mottern signed into the building register and left the document with the desk clerk for delivery to the Bureau. A local cable news station later reported that the FBI refused to accept delivery of it.

In response to the Bureau's actions, the group called another rally for Wednesday, December 8 at noon to demand that the Bureau accept the complaint and investigate the allegations of fraud in time to prevent a possible theft of the election. Wednesday's rally will likewise take place at 222 Bloomingdale Road in White Plains.

Video of the attempted presentation of the complaint, and some footage of the rally, is available at www.debar2004.com/video/120304fbi1.rm

[ooglymoogly]

9. they are only interested in democratic fraud

[JunkYardDogg]

10. Lawyer's Response to Impound the Machines

read this Posting:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=111112&mesg_id=111112