|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-04 03:46 AM by thanatonautos
This section of the law just specifies that 5 electors from a county who voted against the result of a yes/no question can request from a county BOE a recount of the votes on the question in any precinct in the county.
The clause mentioning electors doesn't apply to general, special or primary elections, for which a candidate who was not declared the winner may request a recount from a county BOE in any precinct in the county.
It looks from this as if the candidate(s) requesting the recount can choose the precinct(s) to be recounted.
I think McTigue represents Kerry here, and Kerry so far is an intervenor in legal actions on behalf of the glib recount effort.
There are definitely going to be legal battles to see what will get looked at. We know that J. Katherine Blackwell-Harris is not going to agree to anything, unless absolutely forced to.
Don't underestimate the power that can be exercised with bought and paid for Republicans installed at the top of the state boe. Not to mention various local judges, plenty of whom probably owe the party favours in return for their seats, if the judiciary is anything like it is here in NY.
In and around NYC, fights and corruption in city and state politics have been legendary in the past, and they still become pretty ugly on occasion.
Tammany hall may have been cleaned up, and Boss Tweed is long dead. But the basic system of local bosses, the political machine which is fueled by graft at all levels, still exists. Google John O'Hara, if you want to hear a minor horror story about what can happen when someone tries to buck the system.
In a way the Rovians and the modern Republican party are very much the descendants of the nineteenth century urban bosses, on a national level, with the exception that they have no inclination to do a damn thing to help anyone except their highest level supporters. The local bosses at least helped the people in the neighborhoods of the cities that they ran, and carried out some major beneficial projects, like building the Brooklyn bridge. In return for direct help to the massive immigrant populations, which could come in the form of money, shelter, work, they got their votes permanently, and were then free to live high by bilking the taxpayers on all the public works projects.
But the Kerry letter is very good news ... I'ld say it signals he is going to start intervening actively in the legal battles we will see over the recount. I will start jumping up and down if the Arnebeck filing goes forward, something comes out, and the Kerry team jumps on that bandwagon.
But the mere fact of Kerry taking a more active part can take a lot of pressure off of the less well funded glib lawyers.
It will also focus much wider attention on the story. With the Greene County lockdown, the Arnebeck fraud filing, the EC vote, the Conyers hearings, tomorrow really should be a very big day news-wise. If it doesn't hit the MSM now, I'm going to be in despair.
Get ready for a wild ride!
|