Arnebeck suit before Ohio Supreme Court attacks election of Chief Justice

[bones_7672]

In the petition filed with the Ohio Supreme Court, Cliff Arnebeck claims that Chief Justice Thomas Moyer was fraudelently re-elected on 11/2.

Go to page 41.

http://joeorgren.com/MossvBush1.pdf

Now, let me ask you: Do you think the Ohio Supreme Court will seriously address this if it means overturning the election of the Chief Justice??? Hmmm???

[Guarionex]

1. whoa...yeah...

what's up with that?

[bones_7672]

3. I don't know, I was just reading the suit and I went "WHOA!" n/t

[New Earth]

2. exactly, that was my concern

[IAMREALITY]

4. Bones, out of respect to Keithjx please change the link to below

please edit the thread to show the mirrored one:

http://joeorgren.com/MossvBush1.pdf

[bones_7672]

6. Done, sorry! n/t

[electropop]

5. A little worried about that myself

Heaven forbid they drag it out so long that she ends up ruling on the legitimacy of her own election? Not a re-election I hope?

[bones_7672]

7. "He", and he's been the chief justice for a while now. n/t

[electropop]

17. Oops, got it confused with another race n/t

[Hobbes199]

16. Maybe it's to get her recused before it comes down to that?

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

8. maybe the chief justice is radical right, and now

can't rule on the case if it comes before the whole court due to conflict of interest.

[farmbo]

9. Sounds like Arnebeck's trying to get Moyer to recuse himself...

...and this should accomplish that objective.

[Pithy Cherub]

10. And potentially sets the framework for

an appealable decision as well.

[bones_7672]

13. Appeal to whom?? Federal Courts bend over backwards

to stay out of state races. Even in FLA 2000 the Federal Courts were very leary of getting involved and the difference there was under 600 votes. The diff now is 118,000 in Ohio.

[electropop]

18. Not if it affects the pres race

Remember how the Supreme Cronies jumped into the 2000 race?

[Pseudofool]

20. Federal Courts

"Even in FLA 2000 the Federal Courts were very leary of getting involved and the difference there was under 600 votes. The diff now is 118,000 in Ohio."

The big difference here is that there is a crime, a big one, election fraud. In 2000, there was no crime so you can understand their reluctancy.

[bones_7672]

12. With 5 Repubs & 2 Dems on the Court ...

if you tick off the other 4 Repubs, and, who know, the Dems may even like Thomas Moyer, you certainly don't build any sympathy for your cause even if Moyer recuses himself. And Justice Moyer's election was not the only Supreme Court race we had here in Ohio, but his was the only one singled out.

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

19. who were the others? dems? reps?

[bones_7672]

23. The other race: incumbant Repub Justice was re-elected. n/t

[pointsoflight]

24. That's exactly the intent.

[bones_7672]

25. But for what purpose??? There will STILL be a 4-2 majority for Repubs

on the Court, and Arnebeck is seen as "attacking" a sitting Justice. Doesn't seem like the way to get the court on your side!

[righteous1]

26. Kinda like

entering a beauty contest and first thing pi$$ing on the judge

[bones_7672]

27. Exactly. And this becomes a GIANT lesson in FUTILITY. GEEZ!! n/t

[bmoney07]

11. I like how he thinks and acts

this is a smart cookie!

[seito]

14. Agreed n/t

[Karmadillo]

15. If you're throwing a Hail Mary, no point being timid.

n/t

[righteous1]

21. Maybe, but you don't throw a Hail Mary pass when

only the opposing team's players are in the area

[disillusioned1]

22. Here they are

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/Justices/