Arnebeck suit dismissed without prejudice due to technicality!!!

berni_mccoy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 03:52 PM
Original message

Arnebeck suit dismissed without prejudice due to technicality!!!

The decision is posted online here:

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/0/2004/2004-ohio-6792.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Willy Wonka

(283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message

1. So Arnebeck should refile it as TWO seperate issues

Edited on Thu Dec-16-04 03:53 PM by Willy Wonka

and have the OH Supreme Court expedite it immediately. With threats of flamethrowers and the like.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sabra

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message

2. Read more here...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=168686&mesg_id=168686

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Name removed

(0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message

3. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

New Earth

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3

4. PU n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Straight Shooter

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #3

6. You are incorrect

He filed it in that manner so Moyers would have to recuse himself.

It was a good maneuver, but Moyers wants to hear the big case. So he didn't grant it. Now the suit needs to be refiled as two separate cases.

BTW, for future reference, his name is Arnebeck

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

pointsoflight

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3

7. No, he had a reason. He wanted Moyer to have to recuse himself.

Arnebeck wanted Moyer off the case since he's a partisan republican judge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

CatWoman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3

8. care to offer your services?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Junkdrawer

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message

5. Besides..he didn't file the complaint on 80 lb. paper...

and we all know that in Ohio, if it's not on 80 lb. paper, it's not legal...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

regularjoe

(358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5

10. White and uncoated 80 # paper n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Jersey Devil

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Dec-16-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message

9. He must file 2 separate cases - the Chief didn't like being outmaneuvered

This way the Chief Justice gets to hear the election challenge for the Prez & veep which he couldn't hear if his own election challenge was consolidated in the same case.

This sounds like a load of poppycock to me. I don't know of any courts that favor multiple lawsuits when everything can be accomplished in one consolidated case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu Mar 13th 2025, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.