CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR: What Counts in Ohio Recount
The Christian Science Monitor
Last Updated: December 19, 2004, 02:53:43 PM PST
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1220/p08s02-comv.html<snip>
Tellingly, the recount challenge doesn't come from the Democratic Party, but from the Green and Libertarian parties, which don't stand a chance of winning Ohio even if Bush actually lost the state.
</snip>
<snip>
That's not to say that long lines and touch-screen voting machines that didn't produce a paper trail (as in Ohio) aren't problems that need fixing. American elections must be an example for other nations. Giving Ohio's vote count a clean bill of health would help that cause.
</snip>
Other Clips
FEDERAL STANDARDS NEEDED TO REDUCE VOTER FRAUD, WEEK OF DECEMBER 16-22, 2004
by MAKEBRA ANDERSON
The Wilmington Journal
Originally posted 12/19/2004
http://wilmingtonjournal.blackpressusa.com/news/Article/Article.asp?NewsID=51662&sID=12<snip>
“There is ineptness in the system and a unified system is one approach, but there are other issues,” he said. “When voter fraud occurs, it doesn’t just defraud those running for office; it affects everyone from having fair, elected representation. Even with unified systems you have to have trained poll workers that know what the law is and implement that law in a way that is most helpful.”
According the Shelton, the current voting process has to be fundamentally changed.
</snip>
Link to Google News Search : vote fraud ohio
http://news.google.com/news?num=100&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&q=vote+fraud+ohio