|
Edited on Fri Dec-24-04 01:51 AM by Machiavelli05
I dont know how widespread this speculation was however, a friend of mine who works for a high level elected Democrat official told me about an individual calling in to this official's office with conspiracy theories quoting "inside information" about TriAd and Brett Rapp fixing elections in Ohio. This was late this summer. The office and elected official as well as my friend rejected this guy as a usual nut job that calls in with crazy ideas. My friend never really gave me the specifics at the time, just said something when I expressed my concerns like "yeah some nutjob calls into the office a few times ranting about this guy and his company secretly working for the GOP". We both laughed about it. Until today when I gave my friend the several links from today's occurances, he/she/it said "holy shit, remember that guy I told you about? he was always ranting about TriAd and this Rapp guy"
So there you have it - the ranting crazies who call into politician's offices sometimes are right!
Sorry for the anonymity - however the political fall out for an official with some people on an issue of ignoring the "warning signs of corruption" could be extreme. That and my friend may have violated some sort of office policy by telling me. Best to just keep it vague.
Im not posting this to start rumors - it was more a question.
Was speculation about TriAd relatively widespread early on? I havent really kept up with this issue until recently. I was basically wondering, is it possible this guy actually had inside info, or was he just touting the widespread speculative line that was running around even back in July/August.
|