Just now on Letterman, Dave asked Howard Stern: " how DID Bush win

[johnaries]

the election"? Howard talked about how everyone in the Radio Media is afraid of the Religious Right and Bush,
but an important thing to remember is that People are starting to ask "well, how DID Bush win... it really doesn't make sense!"

YES! Keep asking! "How DID Bush win?"

[Darkhawk32]

1. Howard's the best..... and he ain't afraid!

Go Howard!

Bababooey!!!

[Pab Sungenis]

3. Yes. Thank you, Howie.

But, remember, you're going up against the Bush Crime Family.

Stay off of airplanes. We lost Carnahan and Wellstone, we don't want to lose any more.

[GetTheRightVote]

2. Yes, Howard call it like it is, he is not afraid, got to love him for it

:kick:

[Goldeneye]

4. A month ago, we'd of peed our pants about this.

Heck I still get excited reading anyone who hints that the election was screwy. But this goes to show that we've made a lot of progress. Look at all the news we have coming in. For the first few days it was news we generated ourselves, by doing calculations, and looking at charts, etc. Now there are tons and tons of people in on this.

There is zero possibility that nothing will come of all this. There are just too many people who are not going to stop fighting.

[henslee]

7. And Dave sure is affectionate re: Howard. He's def. in his corner.

These are great men. Dave is a good dude for going out on a limb and sticking up for Howie, another great dude. Though, two quite different dudes. Def. was a meeting of giants tonight. Not like there last meeting which was a bit more tense. Leno couldn't hold a match to these two.

[LittleClarkie]

16. A month ago, we'd have pee'd our pants for 1/2 of what Kerry's done so far

too.

And yet after every step, "it's not enough, it's not enough!"

And with this exchange I see "Why didn't he say it more strongly."

Dagnabit people, must we kvetch over EVERYTHING?

[Dancing_Dave]

5. Great News!

These guys can raise consiousness among a rather wider range of Earthlings than DU can reach! ;-)

[Clark2008]

6. Instead of "What are they hiding?"

Shouldn't we, for the masses who aren't aware of all the polticial "hiding" that has been going on, simply just start asking, "How did Bush win?"

We can move onto "What are they hiding?" sometime after the MSM decides to pick up this story.

[johnaries]

9. What's wrong with BOTH?!

How DID Bush win? What ARE they hiding?!?!?!?

EDIT: I still find it hilarious (but not really funny) when they say that the early exit polls were wrong because they interviewed too many Soccer Moms for Kerry, but then they say that the reason that Kerry lost was because so many Soccer Moms became Security Moms and voted for Bush. :wtf: :argh:

[smartvoter]

13. I missed the soccer mom logic gap. Yet another example. nt

[bunny planet]

18. I'm a soccer mom and I never became a security mom, or at least I never

switched parties to become one. The myth of the security mom is perpetuated the same way the myth of the values voter is, my MSM propaganda and RepukeliCON talking points. Also, most of the soccer moms in NYC region, suburbs in NJ and LI who were most affected by 9/11 did not vote for Bush, the security mom thing is just b*shshite.

[bunny planet]

26. ok, so I'm technically a softball mom!

[understandinglife]

8. 'When did Bush know?' (n/t)

[zann725]

17. "And what are they hiding?"

We're not going away 'til we know!

[pacalo]

10. I missed it, dammit!

Wouldn't Howard Stern be the perfect mouthpiece for getting the message out about the election fraud? Is he aware of it?

[GetTheRightVote]

11. I was thinking about that, he reaches out to a huge group of people

:kick:

[KaliTracy]

25. anyone here currently listen to his radio show?

is he still vocally against the current administration?

[fooj]

12. YES!!!!!!!!!!!

Howard the righteous rebel!!!!!!!!:bounce:

[Lorien]

14. Did he answer the question?

other than to say that people in the media are afraid, yada, yada...?

[troubleinwinter]

15. I don't get it....

The only Howard Stern I see is on TV with him asking chicks to take their tops off... then I change the channel.

?????????

[slay]

19. Howard is a very smart and funny guy.. who likes to see women topless

Add Howard to the list of those demonized by the right. Read either of his books: Private Parts or Miss America and find out just how funny and intelligent Howard Stern is. Disclaimer - Not for sheeple who are easily offended.

[troubleinwinter]

20. I am not easily offended...

I get bored watching young chicks take off their tops and find the conversation relationg to it completely stupid. So where/when does one hear him actually talk about anything?

[me b zola]

22. Ahhh, yes

You see it is rather like going to a movie. When there is T&A for no other reason than the ratings, it is a pretty sure bet the movie has no story, nor any other redeemable motive to see the movie. If a person wants to talk about issues & is informed, then (s)he doesn't need T&A to advance the conversation.

Point in fact: Can You see my tits? Do you have any idea how hot I am?? Do you want to discuss election fraud???

Okay. Point made.
He may say some wonderful things, but, eh, his forum is not for me.

[KaliTracy]

24. story is (and I may be wrong) that he used to support * until

the FCC crap and reading Michael Moore's "Dude Where's My Country" -- his radio show on the one day I listened to it in the spring was pretty rabidly against *

[Old and In the Way]

21. The answer to "How did Bush win?"

Apparently because corporate media gets to decide the validity of the claim.

But quite interesting they won't share exit polling information with the Democrats.....I think there's some very incriminating information in those numbers. BTW, does anyone have a logical explanation why the DNC did not subscribe to the exit polling data???

Any reasons why there has not been an extensive nationwide polling on the issue? Given all the evidence of election fraud, why wouldn't these same news companies conduct a poll to see if the results mirror the 11/2 results?

[nolabels]

30. The correct answer to "How did Bush win?" would be "He didn't win !"

Sorry but Howard is just not that hip about the world, but I do kinda like his promotion of Sirius Radio

He said he was giving up open air broadcasting because of the fines levied by the FCC and then went on and complained more about everything else the right wing blow wads were up to, as it relates to the censorship of him personally, of course. If the guy was serious and had any inking of things other than his fat ass with it's little ego, he would be taking the fight to them that he finds offensive. Like, after all, he could pull quite an audience and level with everybody if he not grown so accustomed to such a storied pampered life he is now living

He has been compromised by the culture he now lives in, so I wouldn't expect too much from his corner

[Name removed]

23. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Kathy in Cambridge]

27. That was BEFORE wide-scale evidence of voter fraud

Do you think there was voter fraud in Ohio and Florida? Evidence certainly points that way.

[theboss]

28. You realize that this was a re-run, correct?

It was five or six weeks old.

[GuvWurld]

29. Danger - this BAD frame reinforces * victory

This frame will invite many people to spew their brainwashed BS about why they dance with the devil.

Better...

How did a winner get declared with so many open questions?

Conditions do not exist for us to have elections that are beyond question. If we continue to have elections under these conditions we will never have an outcome that is universally accepted. There is no basis for confidence in the legitimacy of the results reported from US federal elections.

Check out the No Confidence Movement.