|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
AmerDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:08 PM Original message |
Poll question: Will at least 1 Senator step up January 6th? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Come on Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Will Obama be "seated" by then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Yes, Obama is to be sworn in early |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MandateThis (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 05:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
37. I don't think Obama will stand on Jan. 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 02:15 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Randi Rhodes asked him about election fraud on the radio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 04:31 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Obama has already fallen in with the status quo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Is this a scientific poll? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bones_7672 (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 08:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
38. Yep, as acurate as any exit poll!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Gigmeister (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. But this is not 2000 all over again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepGreen (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. I only voted Yes, because I sure as hell hope so !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. sure you could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepGreen (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Wooo,,, thanks,,,, feeling better now :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Shame on you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepGreen (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Uh Oh,,,, spinning,, spinning,,,,, think I am developing a split |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. Hey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepGreen (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. OK,OK,OK,OK,,,, I be good. If I get the urge again I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. Deleted message |
katinmn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. It's an important milestone, unprecendented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Yes I hope so AND believe so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whalerider55 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. alll. or nothing at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 09:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Well I'm sort of a betting person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whalerider55 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. ps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Thanks! NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyPriest (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Interesting question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Impeachment would have to be brought by Republicans - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
18. Yes. I trust Conyers when he says that we have "several" senators. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. And today on Jesse Jackson's live radio show, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senior citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
21. Not a single one. They don't represent us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 08:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
41. Enjoyed your points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
47. You are correct. Mark my words; not a single one will stand up. By the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dreamcollector (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
24. Yup a whole bunch of Senators will stand up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 09:01 AM Response to Reply #24 |
42. You think it's that quiet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. It's a shame Moore hasn't been more vocal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 06:37 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. He fell as silent as anybody else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
njbuddy (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
27. My heart says yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsConduct (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
28. All the Libs better stand up, otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 10:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. why the Libs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Earth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 10:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. i think they mean Liberals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AmerDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 10:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsConduct (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 03:14 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Yes, I meant all the non-republicans. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senior citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 02:12 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. Never be re-elected? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
32. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-02-05 11:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Deleted message |
sepia_steel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 04:36 AM Response to Original message |
35. Yep. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 05:20 AM Response to Original message |
36. Nope none |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roenyc (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
39. who knows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
40. Nope, not a one. Anyone who believes otherwise is deluding themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-03-05 07:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. OMG, Walt... I do understand where you are coming from...but I'm the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC