Question for the "Non-Believers"

[New Earth]

WTF are they hiding?

And not only that, but



How long can they hide it?


:hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

[Turn CO Blue]

1. What are they hiding, Faye? I mean really...

if nothing shady went on - then why not be in an all-fired hurry to lay everything wide open and PROVE that nothing shady went on???

[New Earth]

2. and how come none of them have answered?

:shrug:

[Turn CO Blue]

3. More fun for them to spread "gloom and doom", then run away.nt

[cali]

4. perhaps no one has answered because of the

ambiguity of the question. Who's they? Do you mean bushco? Or are you speaking of the heretics who don't find the evidence of fraud weighty enough to contest the election?

[mzmolly]

5. I dunno, am I among the "non-believers" ?

Perhaps we should ask for a definition?

;)

I consider myself cautiously optimistic and realistic at the same time. Hope that doesn't cast me into the non-believer freeper category?

[New Earth]

6. what?

it's called a copy cat thread :hi: ever hear of it :hi:

[mzmolly]

7. Yep, just replied to the original.

;)

[New Earth]

8. i still don't understand

there is no reason for anyone other than people are PURPOSELY here to disrupt to be offended by that threaed. i dont' understand why some people are making such a big deal out of it.

[mzmolly]

10. I dunno, but the 7th of January should prove interesting regardless

what happens. :hi:

[New Earth]

11. but why are you acting offended?

i don't remember you ever doing anything mentioned in that thread. why are you referring to it like you did?

now i am offended that you seemed offended.

[mzmolly]

12. I'm not sure I know exactly what your talking about to be honest.

But, I have seen people here (I know are legit) accused of being freepers by people with less than 50 posts today.

[Somawas]

9. Because its not about democracy

its about winning. And they are winning. And they know that if they were forthcoming, it would be dirty. And then they would not be winning.