YES! WE HAVE 4!! MSNBC--Conyers Jackson & Jones (Boxer) CONTESTING VOTE

Karenca

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:39 PM
Original message

YES! WE HAVE 4!! MSNBC--Conyers Jackson & Jones (Boxer) CONTESTING VOTE

Edited on Wed Jan-05-05 04:54 PM by Karenca

Conyers, Jackson, Jones and probably Boxer :)) ...On MSNBC now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sabra

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message

1. WOW!

Who's reporting this on MSNBC?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Karenca

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. it was just on.....

I don't know who the reporter is (was
listening from another room)
Of course, he added how it won't change the outcome.
But I am very happy so far !

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

AnarchoFreeThinker

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message

2. now we're talking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Karenca

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2

4. Finally!! :))........... nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Name removed

(0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Karenca

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. You're on the wrong thread ....eom

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

fob

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #7

9. Wrong THREAD, try wrong WEBSITE!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

insane_cratic_gal

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #9

14. LOL stole it out of my

mouth you did!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rtd2

(48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #7

10. what?

Sh!T I cutted (is that a word?) and pasted the WRONG story!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Karenca

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10

12. you certainly did ..... you can delete it ..... nt

Edited on Wed Jan-05-05 04:57 PM by Karenca

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Oversea Visitor

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #5

8. Should save this up

And post this after Jan 6th and watch DU all all Americans rip them apart with this lame excuse of trying to make Conyers look bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

SeattleRob

(893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5

15. No surprise

This is an example of what to expect from the right-wing noise machine when the Conyers story hits.

They will do everything in their power to attack Conyers' credibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

nmoliver

(129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message

6. that means Boxer ...

Boxer's challenge apparently (according to David Lytel, as relayed by William Rivers Pitt) was contingent on Jones' challenge. If Jones has decided to challenge, I think that the chances of a Boxer challenge go WAY UP!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

WilliamPitt

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message

11. "probably Boxer" is the same goddam story

It has to be "definitely Boxer" for this to mean anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Karenca

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message

13. I'm going to self-kick.

I think this is worth it :))

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

tx_dem41

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message

16. Ummmm...if I'm not mistaken...one of these person's is a Senator...

...and she is shaky at best.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Karenca

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message

17. It's Tubb-Jones ....nt ......

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

tx_dem41

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message

18. There is NO Senator Jackson or Jones. or Conyers....these three

are Representatives if I'm not mistaken. You NEED Senators!

I thought everyone would know this and have all the Senators memorized.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rtd2

(48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-05-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #18

19. you are CORRECT

"are Representatives if I'm not mistaken. You NEED Senators!

I thought everyone would know this and have all the Senators memorized"

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon Jan 20th 2025, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.