|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:21 PM Original message |
We Need a Special Prosecutor Thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babsbunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. We Need Barry Scheck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beth in VT (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. I agree. This wimpy "I'm paying close attention to the GAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The GAO is part of the fire under the White House that will eventually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. Elliott Spitzer perhaps? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marcologico (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 10:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
63. Spitzer would be an awesome prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. We need a tough fair man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. ROFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. bwhahahahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 11:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. OH MY GOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 08:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Methinks his heart's not in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. Another way to light a fire is to get Congressional Election Hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
9. I wanted to link this thread. We are trying to get all action calls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 10:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Kick n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 11:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Do you want this together with Election Reform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill MI (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. Don't get mad, get LOUD!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 11:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. That's the spirit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. Here's contact info on Rep Ney R. Ohio the guy who promise Hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. In case Rep. Ney "Forgets" , Asks the Dems on the Committe to Remind Him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
16. Here is the Thread "Bible" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill MI (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-07-05 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. The Democrats proved they can give 'em hell... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I was wondering why the Administration Committee myself, Judiciary List |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:05 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Judiciary Cont. The Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:20 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Here is my email to Sensenbrenner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k8conant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Nice to see Feeney's on the Jud. Committee.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 09:57 AM Response to Reply #32 |
53. Oh, no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
19. This is the history we hope to see repeated (Watergate) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
euler (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
23. I wish you luck with 1 and 2, but 3 won't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 07:20 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. hmmm, then we need the special prosecutor for Karl Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
25. 3 Letters to the Editor in todays NYT! Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
26. The Special Prosecutor law had a time limit, which was allowed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roenyc (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 08:38 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Seriously? there is no more special prosecutor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 08:49 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. I don't have a link and my memory's not perfect . Try googling it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I think its the Independent Counsel law Ken Starr trashed with his porno |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. You're right: Independent Counsel law expired. Sorry to mislead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. JOhn Dean confirms, Special Prosecutor still a go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forgethell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
71. That's because it was used on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 01:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. This one calls Conyers "Our Special Prosecutor" but he lacks the power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 01:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I thought there was something about Conners needing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zan_of_Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 11:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
64. ya mean Conyers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 06:45 PM Response to Reply #34 |
47. Some cool Conyers letters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 01:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. yes the law was let to expire--no more Spec. Prosecut. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forgethell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
33. As a matter of principle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 01:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Huh? Did you object to Cox when he was uncovering Nixon's crimes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forgethell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 06:40 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. As a matter of principle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
36. Help! Does anyone have a link to the Karl Rove in his Computer Control |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
39. As someone pointed out Blackwell cant get a Special Prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pixelthief (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
41. kick n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday_Morning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
42. Kick! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
43. Conyers is the man to do it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Yes, the Congress can - and so can a federal judge (that's happened twice) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 06:47 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Very interesting. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 10:16 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Fascinating case you cited from 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 12:29 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. No, it appears not, but the reasons why pose interesting questions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 09:25 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. THanks. So it appears that Gonzales will be the only one who can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. We have a chance to have a fed. judge appoint a SP, w/o prior dismissal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Please DO keep us posted! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 07:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Cool! Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidgmills (651 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 09:50 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. I don't know about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 11:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. No doubt - that slippery slope is what's wrong with the SP concept itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-08-05 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
44. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
52. 84 hits for "Special Prosecutor" and "Ohio Election" up from 81 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. How about a class action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 07:13 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Has such a suit been filed yet? The people who were purged from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
59. An aside, I still think Bush an Co. deserve jail for Enron |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
60. So long as the GOP control everything there is no chance in hell they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-09-05 09:36 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Thats another strategy, force fair elections. However, it failed in 2002 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
66. Blackwell orders Democrats to cut the number of precincts...presumably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
67. Link to DU thread of Stuff people are doing to spread the word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
68. WTF! IF CBS got a Independent Investigator for Rathergate Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Niche (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 01:53 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. What about FALSE DOCS ALL THE TIME on MSM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 02:03 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Yep, is why reporters are afraid to touch this one. However, ambition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
69. Deleted message |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 01:39 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. Au contraire, the threat of a Special Prosecutor will keep Congress on its |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 10:39 PM Response to Reply #70 |
106. I'm sorry; did you say kick? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
73. Washington Post columnist STRONGLY hints need for investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 02:05 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. MSM attention.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 02:06 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Two words, Woodward, Bernstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
(1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
74. Secretary Of State Blackwell In Hot Water Again |
Add to my Journal | Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. Sure hope someone's checked to see if he got corporate money before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
79. Great attention getting activity from the Jan 6 DC Protesters! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 05:50 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Healthy Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
81. Amazing what Conyers is doing even without a Special Prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 06:39 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Anyway we could get the Conyers reports printed in handy paperback form |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
83. Link to DU Thread about Redress through Civil Action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-10-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
84. Another concrete suggestion to pile up the "charges" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-11-05 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
85. Why Florida Needs to Be Investigated Even More Than Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-11-05 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
86. Talk to Arnebeck and get his thoughts? Andy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-11-05 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
87. Investigating Florida: Citizens Can Recount There! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-11-05 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
88. Nothing Says "Scandal" Like "ENRON", Be Sure ENRON is at Jan 20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-12-05 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
89. * Gutting DC Office Special Counsel for Whistleblower Protection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-12-05 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
90. Is it really a crime to give federal dollars to Armstrong Williams? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
91. Innauguration Protests! Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 11:57 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Washinton Post link, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 12:49 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Dont Forget the Jazz Funeral for Democracy, Me and my Mom Will Be Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
94. Human Rights Watch calls for Special Prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 03:00 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. This is real journalism! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StephanieMarie (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
95. How about a special prosecuter to investigate * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
97. Waxman Formally Asks GAO to Investigate Elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-13-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. GOOD. The more the merrier! How does this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 10:14 AM Response to Reply #98 |
99. No idea, may just be intended to keep the pressure on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
100. This is something I wrote as a joke, about Dan Burton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 12:07 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. That is hysterical! I hope you sent it just for kicks!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
102. HOUSE DEMS TO ASK JUSTICE TO APPOINT SPECIAL BLACKWELL PROSECUTOR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 12:15 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. YES! YES! YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
104. Link to DU Thread: Contact Congressional GOPers re Election Investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 10:38 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Antbody have the free online fax sites? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
darkworkz (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-14-05 11:44 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. Write your letters to Congress!! Paper is better than email! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-15-05 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
108. FCC to Investigate Armstrong Williams?! Will Dept Edu. Investigate Ohio? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-16-05 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
109. * says in interview dont need Investigation because he's got Mandate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-17-05 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
110. Kennedy Calls (Bush and) "Accountability Moment" "RIDICULOUS" Hahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-17-05 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
111. Constructive Civil Litigation of Diebold Discussed in This Thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-18-05 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
112. Greg Palast for Special Prosecutor! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC