We need hard evidence.

[mdb]

We hear how congress doesn't want to look bad. Evidence has to be the reason. Look what congress did when the photos of Abu Gharib came out. There was no caring the Repubs were going to stomp all over the Dems. The Democrats were not wimps over this and stood up and slammed this incident home to all. They had pictures. We need hard evidence and not just exit polls of fraud.

[Viva_La_Revolution]

1. Well, if they had read the Judiciary report...

They would have some facts. They didn't bother.

[rodeodance]

2. easier to say it was just antedotal -as Linda Cheves just did no Fox

there was a brief discussion on Tony Snow a bit ago.
David Corn from the NATION was on also.
Cheves said Dems were sore losers and what happened with the cert. proecess in Congress just appealed to the Radical left.
Snow was dismisive.

[babsbunny]

3. Moss vs Bush

What ever happened to Moss vs Bush?

[Liberty Belle]

4. The photos didn't stop them from confirming Gonzalez,

the guy who wrote the torture-is-dandy memo. Spineless, gutless amoebas, all of them.

[stillcool]

5. I just love logic...

I think I've been mis-informed on the definition of 'evidence', and Abu Gharib clears that up for me a bit. If there were no pictures there would have been no Abu Gharib. What I don't get is why the threshold is so high for govt and so low for the rest of us. What also bothers me is the complacency of these peoples cohorts. How ignorant are average govt workers?