question for will pitt, please

[seabeyond]

will you have been around so much of it and have a great site in what you have seen. dem convention, rallys, recently you interviewed cam kerry. i have been suggesting our liberals interview kerry on net. so we could clearly and truely hear what is being said to us. trusting they would be able to speak out.

so i was a little disappointed in my reaction to cam kerry interview. i got what i wanted, didnt want to be a whiner.

i have two in laws, one lawyer in el paso, and one lawyer in cape cod, but works out of ohio and spend lots of time in washington. they have pretty much dismissed me. they are strong democrats, they are in the community political enviroment, yet they have never shared talking politics, further, ignore when i do

but i know they have to have valuable information. and i have spent a lot of time, massively researched. i liken it to going to a university adn receiving a degree. study is just that, study, be it school or net

so from your perspective, i am finding a group of intellectuals, part of the process, dismissing what we say in fraud. literally, the nite of election i knew there was massive fraud. i knew it. two months since, all the information i have received, read, researched, there is by far enough evidence for me.

i dont know how you stand on this issue.

you interviewed kerry.

do you think there was election fraud? massive nation wide election fraud?

[meegbear]

1. Will posted a few days ago ...

saying he's gonna take a break from here. You can try contacting him at truthout.org

[seabeyond]

2. ah cool, thank you n/t

[keepthemhonest]

3. he was back yesterday

posting some stuff here though.

[meegbear]

4. I didn't see him ...

thanks. I'll be watching for him.

[seabeyond]

5. he posted an interview with cam kerry n/t

[seabeyond]

6. and to be really clear, i dont need these democrats to believe me

i am not here trying to convince democrats to believe election fraud.

i am more than willing ot let that go, and put in the time and effort gathering information to prove it. for the lawyers.

lawyers do loook at it from a pawyers perspective. that limits their site. that is cool enough for me. i am not so limited