Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A rebuttal to the “There’s been fraud since the election of G.Washington"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 02:13 PM
Original message
A rebuttal to the “There’s been fraud since the election of G.Washington"
I’ve heard some freepers use this argument to discount the election fraud charges in Ohio. They appear to have an “it’s there, there’s nothing we can do about it” approach to explaining the irregularities of Election2004, when in fact they don't want to face the prospect that their candidate cheated.

I got the idea from Fric and Frac, the car guys on NPR. I heard a program a couple of years ago when one caller said she had taken her car to an auto-repair place and explained the problem her car was having. The mechanic tried to shrug off the complaint with “Oh, that’s the way it is with all these cars!” (referring to year, make, & model).

The car guys said the best way to counter this kind of response is to say, “All right, then they all need to be fixed, so let’s start with this one!”

So the next time someone comments on ElectionFraud2004 by saying, “Oh, there’s been election fraud since George Washington…,” say back to them, “OK, then they all need to be investigated, so let’s start with this one…!”

At that point, the freeper would probably switch to another defense ("sour grapes," "poor loser," etc), but this is one way to put the kibosh on the "there's always been election fraud" argument.

Just an idea…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh god
that is the lamest argument i've heard. it doesn't matter how long it's been happening, it doesn't matter who did it when, whether their Republican or Democrat. The fact is, it needs to stop, and it needs to stop NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree. That is the counter-argument I have heard most and
in my opinion it is incredibly weak. Just because something has always been broken doesn't mean you leave it that way. It's a ridiculous position and I suspect they know it. Bottom line, they're happy with the results and don't want to rock that boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. In washington state
the GOP is all riled up. If we can just get them to really stage
an investigation that would include the paperless voting machines,
we might be on to something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm beginning to wonder if Washington State is going to seriously
backfire on the Republicans. If they press too hard they could open up a huge national can of worms. Hmmm.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Pass me a worm. Can't wait for them to overreach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. You should have titled this "Election Advice from Frick and Frack"
...and it's damned good advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nmoliver Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. a similar reply ...
Sometimes people claim that there is no point to fussing because the Democrats are just as guilty as ballot-stuffing as the Republicans.

My initial response was, no ... the scale of the fraud is far greater with the Republicans. Just as, for example war with bows and arrows is war, and nuclear war is war, but the scale of the matter changes the argument.

Today, however, I would reply like this: Then you should be working twice as hard as I am to end it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I always ask,
so you are saying that no election in America is a good one unless Americans get fraudulent representation?

Why do you always sound as if fraud is to elections as apple pie is America; can't have one without the other?

Anytime you have winners and loosers, that's a sport!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Shark Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kennedy in 1960...
...Bush in 2000

Were EVEN!

November 2004 was an insult, and an abortion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That statement about Kennedy is not fair
There is no single state whose reversal would have given the election to Nixon in 1960. If Illinois would have given Nixon the election he was prepared to contest it. But that wouldn't have been enough -- even if Illinois (as rumor has it) really was stolen from Nixon.

Besides that, Bush has just stolen two in a row, which is a record. We are not even!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. I always tell them
So, you think the best cheater should win. They usually back down after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Perfect response. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I always say that the fraud has never been done on such a massive scale
and also, until now, we at least had a system of checks and balances.

HEY!!! THIS IS MY 1000th Post!!!
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. So that makes it okay??
:crazy:

<LOL>

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC