Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

working the GUCKERT angle does not equal HOMOPHOBIA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:07 PM
Original message
working the GUCKERT angle does not equal HOMOPHOBIA
"Political movements arise from the spadework of intellectuals, not politicians."
-- David Brock, Blinded By The Right

One of the things I love David Brock's Blinded By The Right is that it illustrates step-by-step how the Neo-Cons and the right wing usurped old-school radical rabble-rousing techniques to win the war against, well, old-school rabble-rousing liberals. They conducted an insurrection with Gingrich bringing up the rear in 94, and have not much changed their strategy since then.

Basically their strategy is this: we are at WAR with the Democrats and anything less than all-out warfare on ALL FRONTS will not be tolerated. They went after us in the media by launching personal attacks; they have defunded our institutions; and now they are emptying our communities of our young adults so that they may steal oil from the rest of the world. They have won on all fronts.

And yet here we are, day after day, digging and pecking -- fighting for every last morsel of political capital we can throw into the pot latch. We have may irons in the fire. The election fraud front is going strong and has the distinction of introducing us to a class of statesman who will fight with us. I'm talking about Conyers et al here. We have the elevation of Barbara Boxer as a freedom fighter with her elegant refusal to let Condi Rice get away with soiling the Senate chambers with lies and innuendo. We have a diverse and vibrant anti-war movement and finally we have a real Democrat in the DNC.

Slowly but surely we are making progress.

Then, along comes Guckert.

Amid our confusion that this story received no ink upon first glance, and the FIGHT to get it in the evening news, now we must toil with our identity as progressives vis a vis Guckert's homosexuality, because like it or not there are progressives gays who feel prickly about using Guckert as an issue, AND you have to expect that the Rovian response to this battle is going to be an all-out war on our gay-cred. "Well, well, well -- what do we have here? Homophobia on the LEFT?"

Friends and neighbors, don't let this deter you. It is an illusion. A straw man. We are not homophobic. We have the RESPONSIBILITY to our party and our causes (war, poverty, judicial appointments) to follow this story and unveil the machinations behind the Velvet Curtain. There is political capital sitting on the table and the only ethical thing to do is to pick it up and walk away with it.

I wrote the piece on Guckert's ball-shaving, chest waxing and wrestling called: Guckert/Gannon and understanding REPUBLICAN GAY-ness. You can find it here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x107970

See also a more serious deconstruction here:
Question of GAY SEX surrounding White House reveal who we have become.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x330564

It's humor. Irony. I had to affect a voice of shock that I can only imagine from knowing weird "normal" people in my family. I don't care if you shave your balls or your head or your dog. I don't care if you wrassle or square dance or participate in animal sacrifice to get your freak on. BUT, I'm guessing most "normal" people do. Most "normal" people who supposedly voted for Bush. Most "normal" people who look at your piercings and tattoos as a sign of the devil. Or worse, sexual! Most normal people who are being lead by the nose to destroying Social Security and the Bill of Rights.

We are a tribe and we are fighting the same devils. As such we should be keenly aware of our potential for accruing political capital. This is called TACTICAL STRATEGY. In Rules For Radicals, Saul Alinsky outlined 13 Rules of Power Tactics for outsider political action:

RULE NUMBER ONE
Power is not only what you have, but what your enemy thinks you have.
Guckert is not a pawn to us. He is at least a Bishop or Rook. He know's everything about the Velvet Mafia and they are running from him as if some big cockroach somewhere just yelled, "RAID." They no longer control him and they have no idea what he'll do next.

RULE NUMBER TWO
Never go outside the experience of your people.
I think we are much more comfortable talking these issues than your basic Southern Baptist. Ball-shaving, chest waxing -- whatever. I can talk about and not lose my balance.

RULE NUMBER THREE
Whenever possible go outside the experience of the enemy.
See above.

RULE NUMBER FOUR
Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
Well, well, well. Seems like this rule was tailor-made for the Guckert scandal. This one little controversy PROVES they can't live up to their standard of reporting, or of personal conduct. Extra points.

RULE NUMBER FIVE
Ridicule is your most potent weapon.
Indeedy-do. When the Clinton scandal broke, remember the meme of the day was that political discourse was to become the domain of late night television -- that only the Jay Lenos and David Lettermans of the world possessed the ability to speak openly of blowjobs and spoo-stains. And ridicule they did; night after night for like three years. They had independent panels and spent millions of dollars on this ridicule. Guckert provides the means to keep this pot boiling -- take it off the heat at your own peril.

RULE NUMBER SIX
A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
See above, again. What's more fun than ridiculing Republicans and having it STICK. Here's an illustration:
img src="

See how good that feels to see this dumb-ass holding a sign that ironically impugns his own message. Ah, that's good!

(i'm going to save you some of the padding and skip ahead thru the rules now)

RULE NUMBER EIGHT
Keep the pressure on.

RULE NUMBER NINE
The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
Examine this in action on US -- the threat of being labeled homophobes is, I"M SURE keeping people out of this discussion. Everyone knows that the Dems and left wing have supported the gay community thru thick and thin. We have paid heavily for it in some cases. It'd be nice if some gay-folk would get behind this and reveal as much as they know about the Velvet Mafia -- like this guy:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/2/19/204254/937
Padraig Pearse's piece on DailyKOS entitled Gay Facts and fantasies in Propagannon Research
The Republicans are shaking in their cowboy boots on this one, folks -- make no mistake. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

RULE NUMBER THIRTEEN
Pick a target; freeze it; personalize it; polarize it.
The Velvet Mafia goes all the way up to Rove. The connections are there plain as day.

We will not let go of the Guckert/Gannon story until this whole mess is unraveled. If you are uncomfortable with that, there's lots of other places we can use your help. Just know that are purpose is not to trade in stereotypes and Ann Coulter-esque hate mongering. We have fought the gay battles right along side of ya'll for YEARS. Don't reject the most potent weapon in our arsenal. We are not criticizing "being gay." We are using TACTICS AGAINST OUR COMMON ENEMY.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Woohoo! Well said again, nashville_brook.
As always you make excellent points while eliciting racous laughter.

The line that got me this time is:

Ball-shaving, chest waxing -- whatever. I can talk about and not lose my balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. You are dead-on here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. thanks ya'll, when i started getting negative feedback *I* felt the
need to get out in front of it. i guess b/c it's so abhorrent to think anyone would go there unless they were mistaken or playing right field rhetorically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nominate it, people
Worth ALONE the Alinksy points. But a damn fine read quite on its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. I knew it. Rove's a closet gay. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Of course nominate it!
I just did. I forgot before. Too busy laughing.
I did email this post to someone in Europe to help him understand the significance of Gannongate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. if somebody told you it WAS homophobic they are MISTAKEN.
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 07:46 AM by jonnyblitz
either that or I am a homophobic homosexual. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Exchange Bush for Clinton - Change Jeff / James to Jane / Janet
and make her a heterosexual female escort. The story stinks almost as much. This story is not just about gay-ness. An escort with no journalism credentials and talent limited to the skilled use of the cut and paste functions on his computer getting access to the POTUS that even columnists from the NY Times can't get is a SCANDAL. And someone here said that advertising as a "top" escort for $200/hour is your PROFESSIONAL life - not your private life. The fact that the fake reporter with plum access was a GAY escort adds another layer as a glaring example of the hypocrisy of this administration. We can't let this message get turned around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. right you are! i covered this in the frist piece i wrote
Question of GAY SEX surrounding White House reveal who we have become.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x330564


it's not sex like "coupling" it's domination and it goes to the heart of who they are and who they want us to become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NationalEnquirer Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. I know its not, but lets be honest..
If it was THEM doing this, we would surely scream HOMOPHOBIA..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. totally -- it's good rhetorical practice to use the cards dealt you
i guess my point is that our hand is a royal flush and they don't even have openers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. if it was them doing it
it definitely WOULD BE homophobia. They have a proven track record of hate and discrimination. Pretty much everything "they" say and do is projection, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Great editorial. Nominated for greatest. Thanks again.
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 03:30 PM by Pooka Fey
Oh and you're shaved balls piece had me rolling on the floor. It was nice to get the straight 30-something female perspective on the story.

My more important point: Hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian Iraqi children, women, and men are being slaughtered because they happened to be born in an oil-rich country. Artistic treasures from the cradle of civilization are being looted, destroyed, and illegally sold to private collectors to enrich American occupiers - these treasures will NEVER BE recovered. Radioactive weapons are being deployed in violation of international treaties which are killing our American soldiers, slowly and painfully, causing alarming birth defects in their babies; not to mention polluting the Middle East and their citizens - these uranium compounds will be toxic for hundreds if not thousands of years. OH and the U.S. refuses to clean up the radioactive compounds, which is again illegal. BushInc. is planning to invade Iran, inviting speculation of a nuclear holocaust. Our European allies despise and fear our nation and they think we elected Bush, so the majority of them believe that we personally have the same agenda as the Chimp.

We have a moral duty to use the cards we have been dealt, like some of the above posters have specified, to bring down the regime.

I'm forgetting who said this so I can't credit it - but I've been thinking alot about this statement: "those who fight monsters must be careful not to become monsters in the process". It's a tricky game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. i don't know who said that either -- i have hear it said as,
you become what you hate -- very true.


Mark Crispin Miller has a great interview on Buzzflash today, btw. kinda goes with what you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC