Thread in GD -- Bush Won

[merh]

With supposed analysis of the "true electoral college votes" - Can someone explain what is meant by the post?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3176517#3176536

[ClassWarrior]

1. merh, it looks like the poster's saying that Bush** was awarded more...

...electoral votes in error than Kerry was.

It's not clear though.

:hi:

NGU.

[merh]

2. Thanks CW - so good to see you!

I edited this post and the response to the GD post. I am not sure what the OP is trying to reflect in his/her thread. :shrug:

:hi:

[ClassWarrior]

3. Well the title was certainly inflammatory, but I don't think that's...

...what the OP intended.

Good to see you too.

NGU.

[berniew1]

4. This is pretty clear. Documentation that Kerry won

http://www.flcv.com/kerrywon.html

Univ. research studies and Exit polls support Kerry win;
and documentation of vote machine fraud, systematic dirty tricks, phantom votes, other fraud, manipulation of registrations, ballot counting, absentee ballots, and provisional ballots in over 20 states

[anaxarchos]

5. It's sarcasm...

The chart compares the number of election incidents to the degree of Bush support before the election. It is foggy but meant well.