Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP's Pence-Wynn bill ends/repeals campaign contribution limits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 11:16 AM
Original message
GOP's Pence-Wynn bill ends/repeals campaign contribution limits
http://www.citizen.org/congress/campaign/legislation/pence_wynn/articles.cfm?ID=13426

Fact Sheet on the Pence-Wynn Bill
The Pence-Wynn bill would repeal the aggregate limit on the total contributions an individual can give to parties and PACs in a two-year cycle for federal election purposes – currently $61,400. It would also repeal the aggregate limit on the total contributions an individual can give to all federal candidates in a two-year cycle – currently $40,000.


<snip>
Thus, under the bill, an individual could contribute $4,200 ($2,100 for the primary and $2,100 for the general election) to a candidate in each House and Senate race, or more than $2 million, to all federal candidates in a two-year election cycle. A President, Senator, Representative or federal candidate would be able to solicit this amount – more than two million dollars – from a single donor.
<snip>

Repeal of key BCRA provision on “electioneering communications” by corporations and unions. Congress provided in BCRA that corporations and labor unions could not use soft money to pay for sham “issue ads” attacking and supporting federal candidates in the period close to an election.

The Pence-Wynn bill would fundamentally undermine this provision by allowing trade associations, labor unions and non-profit corporations to use unlimited soft money donations from individuals to pay for broadcast ads about federal candidates close to an election. This would repeal a key provision of BCRA and would allow these groups to again use unlimited soft money from individuals to pay for sham “issue ads” to influence federal campaigns.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. On the other hand, we Democrats would get alot more money...
too. The only fair thing to do is to have public financing of campaigns. Otherwise, Democrats will always be outspent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. And they will probably laud this as being a help to the little guy
along with defending free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think that is indeed the GOP Mantra - all the little folk with $2 mil to
give each election cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC