|
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 07:20 PM by Peace Patriot
...machines."
My dear, John Kerry has been an ELECTED public official for how many years? 25? 30? And he's not interested in how votes are counted? Or, that Wally O'Dell and the Ahmanson's had control over the vote count with secret, proprietary software?
What college was that he went to?
Come on, LightningFlash! I'm willing to give him some benefits of the doubt. I really am. He was up against the most ruthless gang of murderers and thieves that has ever gained power in this land--or any land, for that matter. I cannot judge his decision to concede, on a personal basis. I do not agree with those who call him a coward or a shirker. And I don't think he is personally corrupt. But who owned and controlled the voting system, and how that was all set up--with no controls and no verification measures--by Bush's "pod people" in Congress, was plenty well known by people WHOSE JOB IT IS TO GET VOTES.
Their blank stares and their silence now are telling us about their guilt, their complicity and their elitism, not about their ignorance.
We need to determine levels of guilt, complicity and elitism--before we can judge anyone. And someone in Kerry's spot, on 11/3, is not easy to judge. But the people around him, and other Democrats--for instance, Democratic election officials in Georgia, in California, and in all places where Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia have struck pay dirt among Democrats, need to be investigated and driven from office. These people have SOLD US OUT--for money, for power, for lavish lobbying junkets to the Beverly Hilton, and for future job offers.
I'm sorry, but I just don't buy the defense of ignorance in Democratic politicians any more. Kerry may not have thought that the Bush Cartel would have the audacity to do what they did. I'll give him that. But that they had the capability? IF he had been ignorant of that, he would be guilty of the worst malfeasance and stupidity, and I don't believe that of him. More likely, he was poorly advised (and also had an array of forces against him--a Congressional blockade against any investigation of the election (no hope of justice there), a news media ready and more than willing to tear him to shreds like a pack of sharks, a Bush packed Supreme Court, corrupt courts in Ohio, and people in his own party, and among his own advisers, who wouldn't back a challenge.)
But as for our fraudulent election SYSTEM, they are all guilty, as far as I'm concerned--anyone in elected office today who isn't vigorously fighting, in every way possible, for RESTORATION OF OUR RIGHT TO VOTE. Kerry has been about as limp on this matter as all the rest, and I DO blame him for THAT, rather than for having a Bush Cartel target on his back on 11/3. I don't know what I would have done, had I been him in that circumstance--and I don't know the full circumstances. So I cannot judge. But he could be much stronger on the principle of our right to vote, and much more active in restoring that right. And I think it's a form of elitism that he is not.
-------
P.S. Yes, I'm glad for his statements supporting election reform--when I'm not raging with tears and laughing like a hyena at these pampered clowns who claim to be our representatives. Sorry. I'm in a snit today. Yes, okay, he's said a couple of things. That's great! When is he going to point the finger at Diebold and ES&S and tell them, "Begone, Satan!"? That's what I want to see.
|