Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NC Democrats pushing "alternative voter verification systems"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 03:20 PM
Original message
NC Democrats pushing "alternative voter verification systems"
The Democratic led Senate Judicary Committee is pushing an
"experimental pilot program" to be added to North Carolina's bill for voter verified paper ballots.

Led by Senator Daniel Clodfelter, this committee has mangled the bill 20 times now.
Bill sponsor Senator Ellie Kinnaird is defending the latest twist to the bill.
Chairman Sen. Daniel G. Clodfelter (D); Mecklenburg Co., phone 919-715-8331 Danielc@ncleg.net
Senator Ellie Kinnaird (D) (Orange, Person) (919) 733-5804 Elliek@ncleg.net

This bill was supposed to be the "Public Confidence in Elections Bill",
but is turning out to be more like the
"The NC Democratic Election Confidence Game and Pork Bill"

One of the latest maschinations is the Pilot program to put
either video, audio, high speed scanners or encryption schemes to verify the ballot.

Senator Clodfelter is trying to say that this is all safe, and no harm will be done,
because paper ballots will be used *during the experiment*.
Also, that the voters in the experimental precincts can choose between
using the "verification systems" or the paper ballot backup systems.

This proposal was already rejected when the original bill was written,
and experts have written to Clodfelter and Kinnaird to object to the program,
but
I am told that "powerful people" want this,
and
we have to "compromise".

Article excerpt in WRAL:

"Some say questions about the new technology could put the rest of the bill in jeopardy.
However, Sen. Ellie Kinnaird, D-Orange, who sponsored the bill, disagrees.

"We have to accommodate those who want a piece of paper that they mark and can count
and those who say technology is improving and there's something out there that may be much better than we have now," Kinnaird said.

However, Bob Phillips of Common Cause NC disagrees, he gets it right:
"The verification standard should be a paper that someone can view," said Bob Phillips, of Common Cause.

http://www.wral.com/news/4693184/detail.html

Amazingly, it is lame duck State Board of Elections member,
Bob Cordle (also supposedly a democrat) who asked for this experiment.
Lame duck:
http://www.wral.com/news/4696904/detail.html?treets=ral&tml=ral_8pm&ts=T&tmi=ral_8pm_1_07000107072005

(Cordle was the BOE member who reacted explosively to the proposal for an Ethics policy for BOE members)

How can this guy have so much influence?
This program is a trojan horse to eliminate voter verified paper ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC