Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Agency Proposes Secret Voting Standards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:31 PM
Original message
Election Agency Proposes Secret Voting Standards
<A quick search didn't reveal that this was previously posted>
http://www.epic.org/foia_notes/note6.html
EPIC FOIA Notes #6
June 14, 2005
Election Agency Proposes Secret Voting Standards

SNAPSHOT <click for full document>
http://www.epic.org/privacy/voting/eac_foia/
<compiled document here>
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_politics&Number=293709358&Search=true&Forum=news_politics&Searchpage=0&Limit=200&Old=1year&Main=293709358#Post293709358

THE DISCLOSURE
Documents obtained by EPIC under the Freedom of Information Act reveal the complete draft standards for voting technology. The standards, which were developed by the Election Assistance Commission, could determine how votes will be tabulated in future elections. Other documents obtained by EPIC reveal vendor attempts to influence the development of the standards.

THE ISSUE
By January 1, 2006, states are required to meet the voting standards developed by the Election Assistance Commission to receive federal funding. Most states have already applied for or received a portion of $3 billion in federal grants to purchase new voting technology.

THE BACKGROUND
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have found that current voting technology standards do not ensure accurate election results. The Election Assistance Commission is responsible for developing standards that will establish trust and confidence in the nation's election system.

THE SIGNIFICANCE
Secret voting standards undermine trust in the nation's election system. The public has a right to review the proposed standards and to know if those proposed by the Election Assistance Commission differ from the standards recommended by independent technical experts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. the rough draft had already been posted
prior to Epics FOIA IIRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC