Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has anyone had any luck using the DNC Ohio Report to stop DREs?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:30 AM
Original message
Has anyone had any luck using the DNC Ohio Report to stop DREs?
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 01:31 AM by Bill Bored
If there are any party faithful making decisions about voting machines, they had better pay attention to this.

Say what you will about the shortcomings of this report, but it's replete with evidence and commentary AGAINST DREs and in favor of Precinct Count Optical Scan.

So how many of you have shown it to your Democratic (or Republican) Election Officials and Legislators and what were their reactions? It seems that at least 50% of the country should be non-DRE since Dems are roughly half of registered voters, right? So who's selling us out? I'm pleased to say it does not appear to be the DNC at this point, at least on this particular issue.

So can we get the ER&D forum back on the front page now? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm glad you mentioned this report.
I have to be sure to get it to my clerk. Do you have a link handy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wish I had a CLERK!
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 11:24 AM by Bill Bored
You can download it here:

<http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/06/democracy_at_ri.php>

Also, see this thread:
<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x386170>

This should not have to be a partisan issue, but if there are still Democrats who are tolerating/advocating DREs, they need to answer to this report.

If you are going to make law, have a look at this thread too:
<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x386269>

Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Who handles your elections?
I am dealing with clerks in the counties around me too. My county is one of the largest, so the clerk shares the info with other counties in the state. Hopefully, it will work and Diebold will not be approved.

Thanks so for the links.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, THAT kind of clerk!
I thought you meant you had some lackey working for you, as if you were a judge or something. You never know!

Well, from reading some other comments here about this report, I got the distinct impression that it was junk. Glad I decided to read it for myself because it's not.

If the usual common sense arguments don't resonate with the Dems, maybe party loyalty will, and fortunately in this report the DNC has come out strongly against DREs. And they have evidence to back this up.

Their assertion that there was no widespread fraud in Ohio is another story. But we have to play the cards we've been dealt.

When talking to Dems, cite the opinion of the authors of this report against DREs.

When talking to Repubs, tell them that their votes may not be counted either for all we know.

Whatever it takes to convince people that these machines can't be trusted without lots of paper, auditing and where necessary, recounts.

Better, yet, let the voters fill out their own paper ballots and then scan, audit and recount those, and do away with DREs altogether.

How will Demcoratic election officials and legislatures answer to the people and the party when this issue is brought up? Let's use this report against them to get what we know is right.

As far as Ohio, it's clear that they have other issues.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. LOL - lackey describes me - that's what I do.
Having once been a lackey for an elected clerk, I am well aware of the practical aspects of elections and I know why clerks in large counties began to look for other ways to count our votes. Hand counts just became too expensive, complicated and time consuming.

I will gladly pass on this information to folks that can use it.
Thanks again.

Voter Verified Paper Ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbus Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. It helps
A friend of mine is in charge of purchasing new voting machines in a key part of NYState. I sent her the relevant sections of the junk DNC report dealing with voting machines. It is helping her in her arguments with other Dem politicians.

She is not a do-gooder by definition, just a good party official. After reading material I sent her from Ohio Honest Elections Campaign, the Conyers report and the DNC report she is now concerned about the voting machine issue. She is now trying to convince other party officials, in the practical language they understand, of the need to make wise decisions here. Party officials are simply not focused on this issue at all.

She tells me that having the DNC report helps her because it is considered "mainstream". That is why we need to reform the DNC -- whether they know it or not, what they do matters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Thank you Columbus!
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 06:11 PM by Bill Bored
My point exactly!

BTW, if you can answer my other question about the Ohio recount law which can't be found in the law libraries, I'd be grateful. It's in one of your other threads. If you can't find it, let me know and I'll post a link later.

Thanks again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC