Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carteret may try to palm off defective Unilects on other states/victems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 01:59 AM
Original message
Carteret may try to palm off defective Unilects on other states/victems
Friday, August 12, 2005

County wants state verdict on voting machines

BY BEN HOGWOOD
NEWS-TIMES

BEAUFORT — The county is again requesting the State Board of Elections test the UniLect voting system in Carteret.

County commissioners proposed Monday that County Manager John Langdon make a formal proposition to the State Board of Elections to determine the reliability of the system.

Mr. Langdon mailed a letter to both the state and to new County Board of Elections Chairman Bill Henderson, asking for his board’s support in the matter.... rest of article here:

http://www.carteretnewstimes.com/headln2.htm

Note, these articles are not archived on the newspaper's website for more than a week.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. what state is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. North Carolina (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Unilect DRE was decertified in Pa. do you have copy of the
Shamos report? And the Unliect is cerified to the 1990 standards so it is not eliglible for HAVA money-- nor can it be used in a Federal election.

http://www.nased.org/ITA%20Information/NASEDQualifiedVotingSystems12.03to7.05.pdf

http://www.nased.org/ITA%20Information/NASEDQualifiedVotingSystems12.03to7.05.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unilect part II, tested in PA by "new" examiner
Glenn Newkirk out of North Carolina, of all places.
Stay tuned for the news.


He is one of those "industry" guys.

These voting machines companies insist on you voting on their defective pieces of junk. They insist!

The good thing about Unilect is the manual edit feature that allows people to change the votes without any real audit trail.

Fun fun fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Patriot is junk---- not HAVA compliant
one of the worst DREs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC