|
can you expect from Karl Rove? Petty tax theft and voter fraud fit right in with the lying, thieving, mean, hate-filled, murderous, greedy, fascist fraternity he fronts for. No surprise there--but a great find, MelissaB!
I'm curious about these anti-Bush stories that are getting coverage. I wonder what's up. I think maybe Bush and his criminal gang have reached the end of their usefulness to the war profiteers, and they're now going to try to make us feel grateful for a War Democrat in '08. Now that they've ensconced the U.S. military machine in Iraq, never to be dislodged (my prediction), they need somebody competent to run it all, to expand into Iran and Syria (on some pretext) and to get a Draft--things Bush can't do--especially the latter. They are desperate for more cannon fodder, but Bush's political cache is gone. No way he can do that. He can get some more tax cuts for the rich, and pack the Supreme Court in order to head off reform for the next century, but there will be serious civil disorder if he rams any conscription bill through. A War Democrat, coming in on a wave of progressive promises, will be in a much better position to engineer conscription. They also need a Democrat to start taking the BLAME for the things that may happen as a result of eight years of misrule--the economy tanking, for instance. Democrats will be more efficient at running the breadlines.
I know this stinks. What a downer! But we have to be realistic. Without the right to vote, there is nothing we can do about it. Our leaders will be chosen FOR us. There is absolutely no way that a real antiwar populist can get nominated or elected, with Diebold and ES&S tabulating our votes, and with the war profiteering corporate news monopolies endorsing whatever numbers they come up with.
I do see some hope, though, in the lip service that any War Democrat will have to pay to progressive values--such as honest elections. It might help us get election reform done. That should be our first priority.
I think the war profiteers intend for the War Democrat to fail--to take a lot of grief for the continued carnage in the Middle East, and whatever further hardships occur domestically--so they can install Jeb in '12--at which point our democracy will be over. Whether they succeed or not depends a lot on the QUALITY of the War Democrat--his/her intelligence and grit. (We need a giant!) It also depends on us, the people. They will really have us over a barrel. If we protest too much, if we are too disappointed and turn against the War Democrat in fury--which it will be very tempting to do, I'm sure--then we get bloody Hitler. (The parallels to 1933-34 are chilling--Hitler's rise facilitated by the fracturing of the center/left.)
That is as much as my crystal ball tells me. It's a very unhealthy and dangerous situation--eight years of fascist rule, completely discrediting one party, to be followed by our complete dependence on the rule of the OTHER party, as the ONLY alternative--both having been shoved down our throats by rigged elections. The no-alternative, two-party thing has been with us for some time, but now it's extreme. We, the people--the great progressive majority--will have little influence with a War Democrat installed by Diebold and ES&S. They will likely throw sops at us--like NOT looting Social Security, or a small increase in taxes on the rich, or preventing further erosion of women's rights--minor reversals of Bush policy that look good only because Bush was so bad. But fundamental reform of any kind will be very unlikely--which is why we have to make election reform our FIRST priority and push it hard. (And there is so much corruption in the electronic voting boondoggle, it's going to be a difficult fight.)
Who knows what's going to happen for real? These are perilous and uncertain times, to say the least. We've yet to pass the hurdle of getting Dick Cheney out of power--that could be sticky. He is capable of anything. And one gets the feeling that a real serious struggle is going on, within the establishment, having to do with misrule and vast criminality. (--between elements of the Bush Cartel, Cheney primarily, and what may be good, honest people in the intelligence and military communities). I was struck the other day by that weird press event of Bush's, on the hurricane, with Daddy Bush standing behind him on the one side, and Clinton behind him on the other. I get the feeling the Bush White House is in considerable disarray.
If Fitzgerald is going after Cheney, and that massive scandal hits the fan, the future just sort of cracks open, like a supernova, sending out masses of deadly rays as well as masses of light and potential life. Lord knows what could happen. IF that is what is pending, possibly negotiations are in progress to ease Cheney out without death and destruction to innocent parties. (He has been AWOL throughout the hurricane disaster--"fishing" in Wyoming--and now just canceled a trip to Canada "due to Katrina." Reading his furtive movements is like reading entrails.)
A year ago, WaPo would probably have deep-sixed this annoying little article about Rove's petty theft. Katrina seems to have changed the climate in more ways than one--but actually the political weather was starting to shift prior to Katrina, with Cindy Sheehan's courageous protest. But, as to that, I don't think that ANYTHING is permitted in our controlled press that doesn't serve the war profiteers' plans. My theory about their plan to install a War Democrat actually started with that--with their giving somewhat respectful and widespread coverage to her protest.
|