|
I enclose a letter like this to all the requests I get from the DNC, the DCCC, or any other org that should be screaming about election fraud.
I know some don't agree with this approach, but I can't see how it's possible to win any election when everyday the frauds keep piling up. She will not read the letter of course. Most likely nobody will read it at the DCCC. It will be filed in the circular file immediately if not sooner, but at least it is theoretically possible it will have some miniscule effect. Incidentally, the candidate I contributed to is of course Clint Curtis who is hoping to take on the Repub in FL who tried to rig, and probably succeeded in rigging, his own election.
Dear Nancy:
I appreciate your concern about helping to elect strong Democratic House candidates. I too would like to see Democrats returned to power. However, you and other leaders of the party should shoulder some of the blame for the state our country is in. For the past ten years, highly partisan private companies, using secret, proprietary software, have been allowed, and are still being allowed, to count our votes, in nearly every case without auditing or meaningful oversight, resulting in almost certain fraud (witness the 96 election of Hagel in NE; the 02 “amazing” upsets in GA, MN, and CO; the 04 national race; the 05 initiatives referendum in OH), and yet almost no Democrat has said a word about it. Some have even been complicit, taking money from these mafia-style companies, even voicing the company mantras (that elections without a paper trail for audits and recounts are cleaner and more cost effective than elections held entirely in cyberspace). The outrage of the Democratic base grows each day, yet the so-called “leaders” say nothing. Meanwhile, our democracy has already been stolen.
I consider myself a liberal, but that distinction means nothing if Democrats can’t get elected, even when they get more votes than their opponents. Until the obvious election fraud taking place in America right now is, first, recognized as fraud, and then, prevented by law and by solid, unified opposition, all the money in the world will not bring Democratic victories. Where elections are decided by clearly fraudulent machine vote counts, as is the case in American today, to contribute any money is worse than useless: it actually “enables” those who are drunk on their own rhetoric and refuse to look at where the problem lies. If you truly wanted to win elections, all you would have to do is require a voter-verified paper ballot and truly random audits for all elections.
To be honest, I don’t think you will pay the least attention to what I’ve written here since you are already ignoring almost every computer scientist in the country (notice I said “scientist” and not “expert”), Pulitzer Prize winning investigative journalists, PhDs in many fields, especially in statistics (see, for example, www.ElectionArchive.org), and tens of thousands of activists throughout the country. I just finished sending $100 to a candidate who is making electronic voting a number one campaign issue, and I would send money to your DCCC campaign if you had the courage to do the same. I hope and pray the DCCC will one day open its collective eyes to what could hardly be more obvious. As soon as that happens, the money will roll in.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
