|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
rumpel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:19 PM Original message |
Breaking:Lockyer/MacPherson Joint Investigation Voter Registration Fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. your 1st vote, whos next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. I've started seeing these stories while posting the daily thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. "This office has zero tolerance for fraud."???? Then why did he recertify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Votergater (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. Diebold was recertified partly because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. Damn! typical RNC tactic; make it about voter fraud and ignore election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. And why didn't Lockyer prosecute Diebold for criminal activity back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 12:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. He did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 12:34 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. That was a civil suit, not a criminal suit. and all the penalties were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 02:39 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Now I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 10:31 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Thanks for the links, Wilms! I reallly respect your insistence on sources; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 10:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. This shows more Diebold lies & shows what Shelley was up against: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Wow! Look at this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nicknameless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
6. The article isn't specific. Is this about Dem voters having their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. #6, because either they're chasing bogus "voter fraud" as a distraction, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. If they aren't investigating Sproul Associates it's probably puff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-07-06 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. Is it that hard to figure out? Or is speculation much more fun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumpel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 12:32 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Thanks Wilms, that's what I thought. OC & Riverside is quite red, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 11:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Not following this - can you elaborate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I could give McP the benefit of the doubt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 03:26 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Got it. thanks. Plus with people being so furious about the recert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BushSpeak (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
14. SOS: It's the "Scrub Lists" stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. See Wilms post number 14 for some Lockyer stuff and my replies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BushSpeak (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 04:54 AM Response to Original message |
15. Looks like Debra Bowen already got the message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amaryllis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 11:20 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Llinks don't work; they go to Microsoft website. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steve A Play (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 03:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Corrected links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BushSpeak (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Thanks Steve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melissa G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-08-06 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. kickin' and r'in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC