Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warren Stewart: Paying Attention: Audits, Recounts, Verification Protocols

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:00 AM
Original message
Warren Stewart: Paying Attention: Audits, Recounts, Verification Protocols

Paying Attention: Audits, Recounts, Verification Protocols

By Warren Stewart, VoteTrustUSA

April 16, 2006

Why We Need Them All

“Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom” Thomas Jefferson

Representative democracy depends on confidence in integrity of the process through which the consent of the governed is determined. While challenges to the accuracy of election results are certainly not new and even a cursory review of elections in this country reveals that election fraud is as American as apple pie. However, the widespread use of unverifiable electronic voting machines has raised new and heightened concern that must be addressed. Scrutiny of the election process - eternal vigilance at every level - is the responsibility of the citizens of a democratic society.

There are many efforts underway to increase and enhance public confidence in the election process. No single approach – no new law, regulation, or procedure will accomplish the goal of transparent and verifiable elections on it own. We need a variety of safeguards – a few can be implemented at the federal level, many others will require state efforts, and others will take place at the local level.

Recognizing the limitations and opportunities that exist at each of these different levels will allow a more productive debate and implementation of effective measures to protect the integrity of our elections.

snip

That being said, there can, and must be, audits specifically designed to determine the outcome of the election, which may be more aptly called a statewide verification protocol. The development of such verification protocols are in progress in Oregon, California, and other states. This is not the purpose of the audit provision of HR 550, or of any federal legislation. We must not rely only on recounts to determine the actual results of an election we must have an audit process that serves to determine the accuracy of the election results.

snip

http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1199&Itemid=26

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. deserves a kick in addition to a recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC