Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOIA Filed Against DoJ: (Abramoff?/) NH Phone-Jamming - NYTimes Comments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:23 AM
Original message
FOIA Filed Against DoJ: (Abramoff?/) NH Phone-Jamming - NYTimes Comments

Opinion

Editorial Observer


A Small-Time Crime With Hints of Big-Time Connections Lights Up the Net

By ADAM COHEN

Published: April 17, 2006

The Internet is a great breeding ground for political conspiracies, and there is a new one lighting up computer monitors across the country. Bloggers are fascinated by what they see as eerie parallels between Watergate and a phone-jamming scandal in New Hampshire. It has low-level Republican operatives involved in dirty campaign tricks. It has checks from donors with murky backgrounds. It has telephone calls to the White House. What is unclear is whether it is the work of a few rogue actors, or something larger.

snip

Now, Jack Abramoff and his Indian tribe clients have joined the cast of characters, and some records of phone calls to the White House have turned up, though the significance of both of these revelations is hotly disputed. The evidence that the phone-jamming scandal goes higher than Mr. Tobin remains scant. But the watchdogs are right about this: the news media, prosecutors and the general public should demand more information about what happened.

snip

...The Senate Majority Project has been putting key documents on its Web site www.senatemajority.com and is continuing to investigate.

The phone jamming could turn out to be the work of a few bad actors. It could, on the other hand, take the Abramoff scandals to a new level of skullduggery. At least, 34 years after Watergate, we know the right questions to ask.

snip

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/17/opinion/17mon4.html?ex=1145505600&en=4caff9b78bd95546&ei=5070



Group files FOIA for Justice Dept. findings on White House involvement in 'phone-jamming scandal'

RAW STORY

Published: Tuesday April 18, 2006

A Democratic group has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain all findings by the Department of Justice in the probe of White House involvement in New Hampshire's "phone jamming scandal," RAW STORY has found.

"Nearly four years after high-level Republican officials broke the law to prevent people from voting, we still don't know the answer to the question: how high does this go?," Senate Majority Project Executive Director Mike Gehrke said in a press release. "One thing is for certain, the Department of Justice does not investigate the White House after 'normal Election Day activity.'".

snip

" records show that Bush campaign operative James Tobin, who recently was convicted in the case, made two dozen calls to the White House within a three-day period around Election Day 2002 — as the phone jamming operation was finalized, carried out and then abruptly shut down," The Associated Press reported last week.

"There was enough evidence that the Justice Department saw fit to investigate the White House," SMP's Gehrke said in the press release. "If the investigation clears them, why not just release the findings? Why is it so hard to people tell the truth?"

snip

Senate Majority Project press release follows.

snip

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Dem_group_files_FOIA_for_Justice_0418.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, that wacky Internet and its conspiracies!
What will they think of next. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steve A Play Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked & recommended!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. The cure for this is fairly straight forward.
On concluding that this was orchestrated by a fairly large group in the thug party (after all, was there any record of similar communication with the W/H from any other closely contested race managers?,) the contest has to be voided and the win awarded to the party victimized by these crooks.

If this became the rule universally, it would go a long way toward limiting such shenanigans, from either side, or, at least, a more thorough coverup and circumspect execution of their nefarious schemes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick!...This is important!...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
Darn bloggers and internet conspiracy theorists. Simple coincidences...nothing to see here....move along.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. So ask them already:
"At least, 34 years after Watergate, we know the right questions to ask."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
I've officially retired my TFH, because it's all come true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC