Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

6th Cir. Case Holds P-card and Optical Scan unconstitutional!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 11:51 AM
Original message
6th Cir. Case Holds P-card and Optical Scan unconstitutional!!!
here's a new thread in GP-politics if you could keep the discussion going while i take the kids out this sunday afternoon that would be sweet

<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2585602>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. ok, back from the "Y", thanks to everyone over there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did the kids have fun?
Might I suggest we hold off recommending this thread? We don't need two of the same threads on greatest. If we wait for the fifth rec, we can get the monday afternoon traffic to read it by putting it up on the greatest 24 hours from now.

I guess I am saying we might think about thread management from here on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. kids got a good swim in
btw, as expressly stated in the GD-P post, PRECINCT Count optical scan is not challenged DIRECTLY in the Stewart v Blackwell holding. However, that doesn't mean that there aren't other cases that will using the princple of Bush v Gore, and it doesn't mean that there aren't other dynamics or legal principles that come to bear outside of this particular case.

It's good to be very very concerned about these legal developments. It's always bad to be hysterical or despondent. Nobody wants that, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I am optimistic
As the news breaks and the facts come out, certain leaders are bound to begin squirming.

Is this not the first major voting case to wind it's way through to this point, with others close on the heels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. here are access number s for 5 pm EST SUnday
Dial-in Number: (641) 297-4600
Access code: 372008#
5 pm EST, 2 pm PST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. thanks all, there's a bit of a wrap up post at #52 in the GP thread

think of HAVA compliance and Stewart V. Blackwell compliance (equal protection and Bush v Gore) as being separate animals but you gotta comply with both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steve A Play Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Folks, please kick and recommend the OTHER THREAD
in GD Politics in stead of this one! Thank you! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. thanks Steve A Play, please kick other thread, there's now post-
conf call discussion over there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC