If you want election fraud & reform related video archived, PLEASE

[organik]

drop me a note and let me know when and where. I'd LOVE to get as much of this as possible to archive, like the recent PBS NOW, and BookTV with Bleifuss that I missed!

As an added bonus, I'll give you credit for giving me notice when I post it on ElectionFraudBlog.com

[rumpel]

1. great!

have to bookmark that, too
keep us also posted for any new videos especially when we are close so ERD can run it.

[brianmckenna]

2. Jail for Judges

There is not much in the press about amendment e. The State has its hands full defending against the censorship by a State Judge of a website that supports amendment E.

Newspapers such as the Yankton Press and Dakotan will not print paid election ads supporting amendment E. The Judge runs the town of Yankton.

The Judges Order is illegal on 2 fronts. A Judge can not censor a political website and the one of the parties committed perjury. Not just a small lie but out right perjury. Claimed she never used her ex's social security number but his number appears on her credit report. The Judge ignored the proof of her credit report. The only way is could appear on her credit report is if she used it in a financial transaction. The Yankton Sheriff knows and even wrote a letter he knows of social security number fraud but it is not his problem.

The South Dakota Supreme Court wants a Grand to hear the case. Justice has a price.

Maybe he could right a bunk of no account checks using fake social security numbers as that is what judges favor in South Dakota

None of the U.S Senators or House of Rep wants to do anything as it is a hot potato best to stay away from.

goggle southdakotagov.info

[mom cat]

3. Great Idea! Rate this one up!