Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Hayes Phillips lawsuit in Cinti. Enquirer politics blog, comments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:45 AM
Original message
Richard Hayes Phillips lawsuit in Cinti. Enquirer politics blog, comments
by Election Reform DUers encouraged. The Enquirer politics bloggers keep revisiting this issue. Warren County lockdown remorse perhaps?

Comments are moderated but do get approved.

http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/gov/
The politics blog

Findings detailed in 2004 election lawsuit

Here is an affidavit filed Friday afternoon in federal court in Columbus by Richard Hayes Phillips, a scientist from Canton, N.Y., who has investigated ballot-counting problems in Ohio ever since the 2004 election.

Phillips' declaration to U.S. District Judge Algenon L. Marbley was made in support of a lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court alleging ballot irregularities in 11 counties including Hamilton, Butler, Clermont and Warren counties.

In several passages, Phillips expresses concern that unused ballots -- which were to be saved at least until this weekend under federal law -- could provide evidence of tampering. They've been discarded in at least two counties.

"The Butler County Board of Elections was able to produce the unused punch cards. They also produced, in the form of a packing slip, what appeared to be a complete inventory for each precinct," Phillips writes. "All were accounted for, and all were pristine. This only raises the question as to why the Boards of Elections in Clermont, Hamilton, Montgomery, Stark, Summit, Trumbull, and Warren counties cannot produce their unused ballots."

Phillips later concludes: "Having reviewed a substantial amount of forensic evidence, it is my conclusion that there is direct evidence of ballot tampering in each of the eleven counties whose public records I have examined, and that there is a compelling need to protect the evidence from destruction, presently scheduled to take place on or shortly after September 2, 2006."

His complete declaration can be found here:
Declaration%20of%20Richard%20Hayes%20Phillips.doc

My comment on Friday's ballot destruction blog entry:

The Enquirer failed to fully investigate Warren County in '04.

Nowhere on the punch cards in Warren County is the precinct identified by punch code, and nowhere on the front of the punch cards is the precinct identified in writing.

According to Dave Keeler, President of Dayton Legal Blank, Inc., which prints ballots for 70 of 88 counties in Ohio, the precinct must be printed on the back of each punch card ballot, by law.

If ballots from one precinct are shifted to another precinct and tabulated as if they are from that precinct, mandatory candidate ballot rotation by precinct dictates that a true vote for candidate A becomes a fraudulently counted vote for candidate B.

Here are photographs of Warren County ballots where you can clearly see that the precinct is not identified:

http://www.freepress.org/images/columns/Ballots.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. No comments yet, but I left 2 including this article:
Free Press uncovers evidence of ballot tampering in Warren County, Ohio
April 19, 2006

After locking out all media observers and declaring a Level 10 Homeland Security Alert, the Republican-dominated Warren County, Ohio reported the vote tally in the wee hours of the morning on November 3, 2004 -- and gave George W. Bush a surprising 14,000 vote boost. Two election workers told the Free Press that the ballots had been diverted to an unauthorized warehouse where they had been possibly stuffed. That is, punched for Bush only. Maps were supplied to the Free Press showing the locations of the warehouse and the Board of Elections.

Warren County officials refused to allow the Columbus Institute for Contemporary Journalism to handle the ballots, but they did allow us to photograph a few. Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D., has analyzed the ballots for the Free Press and concluded that there is evidence of fraud in Warren County. The ballots as photographed with Dr. Phillips' commentary below each ballot are included here for the first time.

The Free Press predicted early on that the ballots would be found punched only for Bush in Warren County. The Moss v. Bush lawsuit pointed to Warren, Butler and Clermont Counties as the three counties that provided more than Bush's entire margin in the Buckeye State: Bush won Ohio by 118,000, and 132,000 votes were supplied in these three southwestern Republican counties.

Now, for the first time, the Free Press is releasing images of the obvious election fraud in Warren County. The Free Press will continue its ongoing investigation in Ohio despite stonewalling by Republican state officials. See the images by clicking on the link below.

View the actual ballots. (6.48MB -- PDF)

<snip>
http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2006/1355
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is the weekend so comment approval can be slow, my Sat. morning
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 12:45 PM by rosebud57
comments were approved one at a time, so perhaps each blogger approves his/her own blog entries. With the elections approaching and this web site (Cincinnati Enquirer/Cincinnati.Com)being in a page view/unique visitors league of it's own that lefty blogs anf forums cannot match and reaching both sides of the aisle, we should all resolve to spend time leaving comments on MSM sites.

For those who may not have noticed this particular MSM blog keeps stretching to revisit the Stolen Election 2004 issue. This is the paper that stumbled on and broke the Warren County lockdown story. Perhaps the blog is where these reporters are relatively unfettered by editorial control. I do know this, based on geography (SW Ohio reporting on all the counties most suspected) these particular reporters are in a unique position to uncover more facts and could surprise us all by rising to Toledo Blade greatness. So be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. comments approved thus far
Anonymous said...
Why was there never a full investigation into the FAKE Warren County homeland security alert on Nov 2? After this new evidence which has been uncovered, I am glad to see the Cincinnati Enquirer willing to revisit the discussion of what occurred on Nov 2, 2004.

Blackwell has said he leaves the decision to save the ballots up to the individual BOEs (the same ones that serve at his discretion). This is just a political cop-out intended make him look good and let his lackeys make the ugly decision. If he really wanted to save the ballots, as Secretary of State he could. Pressure needs to be applied to force his hand.

12:05 PM, September 03, 2006


Anonymous said...
In case you are interested in viewed the tampered ballots, go to this article:

Free Press uncovers evidence of ballot tampering in Warren County, Ohio
April 19, 2006

After locking out all media observers and declaring a Level 10 Homeland Security Alert, the Republican-dominated Warren County, Ohio reported the vote tally in the wee hours of the morning on November 3, 2004 -- and gave George W. Bush a surprising 14,000 vote boost. Two election workers told the Free Press that the ballots had been diverted to an unauthorized warehouse where they had been possibly stuffed. That is, punched for Bush only. Maps were supplied to the Free Press showing the locations of the warehouse and the Board of Elections.

Warren County officials refused to allow the Columbus Institute for Contemporary Journalism to handle the ballots, but they did allow us to photograph a few. Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D., has analyzed the ballots for the Free Press and concluded that there is evidence of fraud in Warren County. The ballots as photographed with Dr. Phillips' commentary below each ballot are included here for the first time.

The Free Press predicted early on that the ballots would be found punched only for Bush in Warren County. The Moss v. Bush lawsuit pointed to Warren, Butler and Clermont Counties as the three counties that provided more than Bush's entire margin in the Buckeye State: Bush won Ohio by 118,000, and 132,000 votes were supplied in these three southwestern Republican counties.

Now, for the first time, the Free Press is releasing images of the obvious election fraud in Warren County. The Free Press will continue its ongoing investigation in Ohio despite stonewalling by Republican state officials. See the images by clicking on the link below.

SNIP

http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2006/1355

12:11 PM, September 03, 2006


Jeff said...
George Bush won. Twice. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. More comments, this is SW Ohio and a chance to educate the buyers remorse
Bush voters.

John said:
There's a temptation here to lay all election problems at the feet of Secretary Blackwell. While it's clear Blackwell's record as chief election adminstrator is abysmal, the longer term objectives of true election reform suggest citizens and legislators take a much broader view.

Face it, most citizens -- of which I am one -- were blissfully ignorant of election processes until Florida 2000. Then we began seeing the sordid mess our elections were, and still are, in. Punch cards woefully indadequate for accurate vote tabulation; central tabulators that can be easily hacked; the politial role of Secretaries of State; improper voter purging; recounts halted, and so forth.

While we're stuck at the present time with the results of two flawed presidential elections which in part gave us 9/11, several thousand American casualities in Iraq, up to 200,000 civilian casualties in Iraq, and an American image at an all time low, the longer term question is whether there will be a viable democracy in these United States. Thank goodness folks are finally waking up and taking a look at our elections, the very basis of our form of government. This is neither a Republican nor Democratic issue, it is an American issue. Let the investigations continue, and let the chips fall where they may.

9:13 PM, September 03, 2006


Anonymous said...
Bush won twice you say? Then why not give full access to public records and let them attempt to make their case in a fair court of law? If you are so confident, Jeff, then why not let them try and fall on their faces if nothing is there? Even better, If Blackwell has nothing to hide-how about him going under oath and testifying to the House Judiciary Staff?

11:34 PM, September 03, 2006


Anonymous said...
Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000 by over .5 million votes. In adidtion, the State of Florida took 50,000 black Floridians, legitimate voters, off the rolls before the election. That's a fact. Florida and and the software vendor agreed to a consent decree to settle the case. No doubt at all. With those voters, Florida isn't even close. Oh, and there's the 110 thousand discar ballots, "spoiled", in primarily black precincts in 2000. Bush was selected not elected.

The statistical work Hayes has done is first rate. I've reviewed it. If you think Bush won Ohio, then throw oopen the books, investigate, debate, and be prepared for a rude surprise. It was stolen in 2004 too!

Did you know Bush's net margin in rural rural was less in 2004 than he in 2000, less, fewer. He broke even in the subburbs. Where did he make up for the losses? IMHO, two Bush "victories" is nonsense. Hayes has his analysis down tight.

Fasten your seatbelts Ohio. Of course, will it get covered...why not!!!

Michael Collins

11:58 AM, September 04, 2006


John Galt said...
Gore won in 2000 Jeff. He won the popular vote, and it was the supreme court that appointed Bush president. Who knows who actually won in 2004, with the voting irregularities in Ohio and Florida.

2:03 PM, September 04, 2006


Andy said...
John; Gore didn't win in 2000. Popular vote doesn't elect a president and every major newspaper counted the ballots from the 2000 election in Flordia. Al just didn't have the votes. Get over it. As far as 2004 goes, I agree let it go to court so you and the rest of the cry babies can have your day and then shut up!!

5:12 PM, September 04, 2006


Jeff said...
Anon 11:34, they've kept the ballots for 22 months as required by law. The sore losers have had nearly 2 years to make any of their conspiracy theories work.

The 2004 Elections have been decided. George Bush won, with room to spare. Get over it!

11:28 PM, September 04, 2006


Anonymous said...
Jeff & Andy, Bush stole the 2000 election twice.

The London Observer on November 26, 2000 wrote:
Vice President Al Gore would've easily strolled to victory in Florida if the state hadn't kicked upt to 66,000 citizens off the voter registar five months ago as former felons. In fact, not all were ex-cons. Most were simply guilty of being African American.

CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin proves it in his book "Too close to call".

The U.S. Civil; Rights Commision held hearings about the disenfranchisement of voters. Their draft report shows incredible disparities between spoiled votes in poor and rich counties, particularly in African American districts.

"Black voters were 10 times more likely than non black voters to have their ballots rejected."

The Wall Street Journal noted the discrepancies: "While the overall rejection rate was just under 3%, the rate was nearly four times as high in the precints that are predominantly black".

The Supreme Court stopped the recount because as Scalia said if the recount continues it could "threaten irreperable harm to petitioner"(George Bush). Then his son Eugene got an appiontment in the administration.

The facts are out there and Governor Bush lost. Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris weren't exactly acting in a non-partisan way and either did Ken Blackwell.

12:42 AM, September 05, 2006


Anonymous said...
Liberals are just so, so pathetic.

Sore losers, just crybabies like 2000.

Vote Democrat - or We'll Cry 2006

.

7:08 AM, September 05, 2006


Anonymous said...
Jeff, Election investigators have NOT had 2 years to make their case thank to a PARTISAN SOS (who by the way was Co-chair of Bush/Cheney '04-how would republicans feel if the tables were turned and a Dem SOS acted in such a NON PROFESSIONAL way?)

Gore won FL in 2000 but the SCOTUS in a 5/4 decision gave it to Bush after stopping the recount. BTW the protestors who stormed the recount where non other than GOP operatives. Surprise, surprise. Why isn't Bush V Gore being used in Law Schools?

10:28 AM, September 05, 2006


Anonymous said...
More on Ohio's election problems from the New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/05/opinion/05tue1.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Ken Blackwell is a liar, thief and a traitor.

10:51 AM, September 05, 2006


Anonymous said...
NeoCons are pathetic!

They steal elections at home, prop up puppet regimes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti and Saudi Arabia all in the name of Democracy. What a bunch of hypocrites.

No to partisan election officials and no to private partisan companies counting our votes!

10:56 AM, September 05, 2006


Anonymous said...
The U.S. Civil Rights Commision held hearings about the
disenfranchisement of voters. Their draft report, Voting Irregularities
in Florida During the 2000 Presidential Election published June 8,
2001, stated:

Black voters were nearly 10 times more likely than non black voters to
have their ballots rejected. Poor counties, particularly those with
large minority populations, were more likely to posses voting systems
with higher spoilage rates than the more affluent counties with
significant white poulations. There is a high correlation between
counties and precincts with a high percentage of spoiled ballots, that
is, ballots cast but not counted.

Nine of ten counties with the highest percentage of African American
voters had spoilage rates above the Florida average.

Of the 10 counties with the highest percentage of white voters, only
two counties had spoilage rates above the Florida average.

Gadsen County, with the highest rate of spoiled ballots, also had the
highest percentage of African American voters.

Where precinct data were available, the data show that 83 of the 100
precincts with the highest numbers of disqualified ballots are black-
majority precincts.

Florida's optical-scan voting machines could be set two ways. They
could throw away ballots that weren't correctly marked or they could
return them to the voters to be corrected.

The machines in counties with large black and poor populations were set
to eat bad ballots. In whiter and wealthier counties were set to
politely return ballots that were improperly marked to be corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC