Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

quote of the day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 02:49 AM
Original message
quote of the day
"The Federal government is failing to protect our democracy from an imminent threat. Electronic voting machines are open to fraud and can be compromised by hackers. But the federal government can not enforce security standards for electronic voting machines. It hasn't set specific standards yet."

CNN's Lou Dobbs, 7/1/06
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Votergater Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. It seems the FEC 2002 Standards has some security rules
in its 'Software Integrity" section... (Section 4:2:2 i think). The wording specifically prohibits interpreted code because it is a security concern. But of course sadly these standards are not nearly good enough as Harri Hursti's hacks and now Princeton's hacks prove conclusively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Haven't you heard...
...those standards are voluntary, even for the folks who wrote 'em!
<http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1299&Itemid=26>

If you want to interview someone for your movie, why not try Brit Williams, Merle King, H. Stephen Berger and Paul Craft?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Votergater Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes the standards are voluntary for states to decide...
...but once states pass law mandating that the machines/systems must comply with the FEC (or EAC) Standards then in those states the standards must be legally binding. No?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARYLAND ELECTION LAW:

http://www.elections.state.md.us/citizens/law/el9/el_9-102.htm

TITLE 9. VOTING
SUBTITLE 1. VOTING SYSTEMS
§ 9-102. Certification of voting systems.

(2) the voting system has been:

(i) examined by an independent testing laboratory that is approved by the National Association of State Election Directors; and


(ii) shown by the testing laboratory to meet the performance and test standards for electronic voting systems established by the Federal Election Commission;...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the way I did interview Brit Williams in 2004 and he admitted on camera that if a hacker could swing a populous county in Georgia then they could conceivably swing the whole state. Paul Craft ran away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. What.....
....this guy doesn't like republican rule? Pubs rule and dems drool.

All this talk about vote stealing is making me ill. They wouldn't do that!

Not here in the good ol' USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. PK, but even "specific standards" aren't going to help much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Febble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why not?
And what does PK mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC