Colorado Election Reform Update 9/22/06

[eleny]

From Voter Action

Colorado Update: Certification - New Standards, Testing for Security to be Required
September 22, 2006

Court Upholds Colorado Voters Challenge to Electronic Voting System Certification - New Standards, Testing for Security to be Required Post-November

Judge orders Secretary of State to produce and implement voting security plan for all counties

For Immediate Release: Denver, CO, September 22, 2006 - In a legal victory this afternoon in the Colorado voters' lawsuit challenging Secretary of State's Gigi Dennis' cursory certification of electronic voting systems manufactured by Diebold, Sequoia, ES & S, and Hart, the District Court in Denver decided that it will not permit the use of these systems post November 7th until real security standards are adopted and the machines are retested to meet these standards. In his ruling, Judge Lawrence Manzanares said the Secretary of state had failed to create minimum security standards, as required by state law, and did an "abysmal" job of documenting the testing during its certification process. He also ordered the Secretary of State to adopt state-wide security standards before the November 2006 election, and ensure compliance from all Colorado counties using the machines.

"The Colorado voter plaintiffs are extremely pleased with this victory. The Court's decision upholds our challenge to the reliability of the certification process as well as the security of the vote when electronic voting systems are in use," said Paul Hultin, Counsel for the plaintiffs, who led the litigation team at Wheeler Trigg & Kennedy LLP, in Denver , which is providing pro bono legal services in the case.

"The Court's ruling is a victory for the plaintiffs and for all voters in Colorado who are concerned about upholding the integrity of the vote. The Court's decision is tantamount to de-certification of the electronic voting systems of the four major electronic voting machines, which is what the Colorado voter plaintiffs have been fighting for.The stakes are too high, and elections too critical to turn them over to private vendors with troubled histories and no accountability," said Lowell Finley, co-director of Voter Action and co-counsel in the Colorado case and in similar voters lawsuits in California, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and New Mexico.

"Electronic voting machine breakdowns have wreaked havoc in recent state primaries, disenfranchising thousands of voters and calling into question election results, " said Holly Jacobson co-director of Voter Action. "While we are pleased with today's verdict, the serious security flaws inherent in electronic voting technology - confirmed in a new study by Princeton University experts last week, underscore the need for more secure and verifiable voting systems. Paper ballots do not fail to boot up and can be reliably counted, audited and recounted. This is why half the counties in the country are using them. Maryland 's Governor Ehrlich announced his support for returning his state to paper ballots earlier this week".

The lawsuit was filed on June 1st by a diverse group of Colorado voters, among them Democrat, Republican, Independent, and Green Party members, as well disabled voters. The plaintiffs are represented pro bono by the law firm of Wheeler Trigg Kennedy, LLP, and was supported by Voter Action, www.voteraction.org, a non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring election integrity in the US . Voter Action is a project of the International Humanities Center, a 501(c) (3) organization.

###

Media Contact: Holly Jacobson, Co-director, Voter Action, www.voteraction.org, [phone], Connie Proulx, Wheeler Trigg Kennedy LLP, [phone], or Emma Mackinnon, FENTON, [phone], IM emmaatfenton.




Voter Action

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

email: [e-mail]
web: http://www.voteraction.org

[texpatriot2004]

1. Awesome! Fantastic! Woo-Hoo! check this out

"...to adopt state-wide security standards before the November 2006 election..."

[texpatriot2004]

2. Oh Dammit, I misread it didn't I nm

[rumpel]

3. i had to read it twice, too - but

it seems "some" security system has to be in place - whatever that is going to amount to - I hope they decide paper and hand count.

[texpatriot2004]

4. I hope so too nm

[eleny]

6. Colorado encourages people to vote by mail

You don't have to prove that you're going to be out of town or any of that. We're urged to sign up for mail-in voting and to do it early. I think we may just be getting a good system in early enough in the age of electronic voting to save us. At least we'll have lots of paper ballots to count for accuracy in the case of recounts. And with this lawsuit it's another notch in the belt of verified voting advocates.

I'm sure that "purple" Colorado was in Rove's sites as a state to mess with. The Republican governor certainly did his best to put off voter verified paper trails until after the 2008 election. This ruling is a step in the right direction as it gives our side the momentum.

[BeFree]

5. The only security is....

...paper ballots with, at a minimum, a proper audit. The best security is hand to eye counts. We will see how far the judge goes, and how much more bs he'll put up with from the Secretary of State.

There being no way in hell a DRE can be made secure, 'cept for throwing them in the water, all DREs should be dismissed and not used. Paper ballots then are the only option.

It is really that simple. We'll see how educated the judge is, eh?

[eleny]

7. See my reply #6 about paper ballots in Colorado

I so agree with your thoughts!

[Wilms]

8. K&R n/t