what should be the punishment.
Many voters and pollworkers allege that a lot of the ballot designs used in the Dist 13 election were clearly biased against the Democrat Jennings, of the nature of the butterfly ballots that swung thousands of votes from Gore and lost him the presidential election. Such ballot designs are well known in Florida for this reason, so SOE and SOS who chose and approved the designs should have known of the likely outcome, that being a major swing in votes from Jennings to Buchanan.
If this is documented in the audit, as expected, is this clearly a case of malfeasance?
and if so, what is the punishment under Florida law?
what should be the punishment?
Voters descritions of anomalies they saw on election day in Sarasota
from another thread
1. House race (among others) did not appear in the main voting screens but did appear in the review screen.
2.House race appeared in the main voting screens but was positioned in such a way that it was easy to miss.
3.House race appeared in the main voting screen at the bottom of one screen and then fell over into the following screen. Jennings was on the second of the two screens in a small font and was therefore very easy to miss.
4.Voter touched to select Jennings but no selection for that race showed up when arriving at the review screen.
5.Voter touched to select Jennings but Buchanan selection showed up for that race when arriving at the review
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=457470&mesg_id=457470