Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hand Counted Paper Ballots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 02:56 AM
Original message
Hand Counted Paper Ballots
http://www.just-a-webpage.com/rantings/?p=116

SNIP...Paper ballots may be considered old fashioned and low-tech but they work. There is verifiable proof that is accessible by everyone. It is also very difficult to be alone with paper ballots for more than a few seconds to a few minutes, hardly enough time to transform the results to one more to your choosing. Paper is also easy to understand and figure out, whereas electronic voting, whether open or closed source, is often confusing for the average voter.

There is also the problem that, even if the source code is released, would it be the same as what is registered on the machine in question or can that information be erased? By not actually being able to look at the source code at all only invokes more questions about trusting the accuracy and security of votes instead of easing people’s minds about legitimate elections.

You cannot, at this point in time, verify the results of electronic voting. You cannot even verify that the parts of the machine are functioning properly. Paper ballots allow you to watch and verify everything from counting the number of people voted against the number of ballots, to actually looking at the ballot and verifying the count.

Trusting experts on the reliability of these systems is also akin to someone asking you to sign a piece of paper in another language that you do not understand and having them say, “trust me, you won’t be screwed.” If people cannot understand the ideas, concepts, and math behind how electronic voting works, even when the source code is placed in front of them, they should demand a return to paper ballots. All election results should be easily understood and verified by everyone simply by looking at them


http://www.just-a-webpage.com/rantings/?p=116
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnotherDreamWeaver Donating Member (917 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Even with paper ballots, the scanner reading it can have "rigged program"
I hope a large percent of ballots would get hand counted, under camera to verify vote. (I'm not against all ballots being hand counted, It just takes more time but, there likely would be enough volunteers to see that it happens.)
adw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I can only say one thing, KEEP HOPING
cause your wish, will soon come true, We The People Have PLENTY OF TIME to count, not only a large percent, BUT ALL THE GODDAMN BALLOTS BY HAND!!!! Bring your Camera!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That's why so many of us are now saying
Paper ballots, counted by hand

period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Paper ballots, count by hand, verify by machine
Machines should check hand counts, period. Check and balance!

The solution everyone will accept and trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Definitely true. The scanners are just like touchscreens in their programming.
If they're used, there has to be a required ROBUST audit. Otherwise, the scanners are no different than the touchscreens.

As things now stand, we have totally secret vote counting WITHOUT VERIFICATION. And obviously you can't have a democracy when that's the case.

Just because the scanner scans a paper ballot doesn't mean that the vote counting is transparent. The counting takes place in the bowels of the black box in accordance with the machine's programming.

The good thing is that the paper ballot can be kept for audits and recounts and if there are truly fair and robust audits, I think you could be pretty sure of a fair count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I would agree, under just about any other set circumstances
but not when you are dealing with a bunch of CROOKS, the Politicians and the voting machine companies are in bed together, THEY ARE NOT YOUR FREIND! And I repeat, THEY ARE NOT YOUR FRIEND!

This is our country, Hand Count the Paper Ballots, we do not need these e-sleeze machines in between us and vote count, there is no reason for it, You and I both know that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Paper Ballots Please.
The souce code, and understanding it is a stubling block to the voter. Get rid of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. HCPB's--That's how I want to vote!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galloglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. A toast to Kiteinthe wind !
I've already posted the story about Show Me The Vote's squad who hit St. Chuck's County, MO.

Now give a toast to our operative, kiteinthewind :patriot:, who kept Kansas City from stealing the election!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. .
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-08-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Paper Ballot, Publicly Hand Counted,....
Edited on Mon Jan-08-07 12:57 PM by bvar22
AT the Precinct (or polling station), results posted on the door.

I don't want the ballot boxes out of public custody until the ballots are counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC