http://www.just-a-webpage.com/rantings/?p=116SNIP...Paper ballots may be considered old fashioned and low-tech but they work. There is verifiable proof that is accessible by everyone. It is also very difficult to be alone with paper ballots for more than a few seconds to a few minutes, hardly enough time to transform the results to one more to your choosing. Paper is also easy to understand and figure out, whereas electronic voting, whether open or closed source, is often confusing for the average voter.
There is also the problem that, even if the source code is released, would it be the same as what is registered on the machine in question or can that information be erased? By not actually being able to look at the source code at all only invokes more questions about trusting the accuracy and security of votes instead of easing people’s minds about legitimate elections.
You cannot, at this point in time, verify the results of electronic voting. You cannot even verify that the parts of the machine are functioning properly. Paper ballots allow you to watch and verify everything from counting the number of people voted against the number of ballots, to actually looking at the ballot and verifying the count.
Trusting experts on the reliability of these systems is also akin to someone asking you to sign a piece of paper in another language that you do not understand and having them say, “trust me, you won’t be screwed.” If people cannot understand the ideas, concepts, and math behind how electronic voting works, even when the source code is placed in front of them, they should demand a return to paper ballots. All election results should be easily understood and verified by everyone simply by looking at them
http://www.just-a-webpage.com/rantings/?p=116