Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's see if the vendors can get out of this one.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:30 AM
Original message
Let's see if the vendors can get out of this one.
Some posters may feel a bit embarrassed that Debra Bowen didn't stroll into office and outright ban DRE's in general, and poster child Diebold in particular. No mind. This could be even more fun.

Now, this is just a draft. And she asks for public comment.



Draft Criteria -

TOP-TO-BOTTOM REVIEW OF ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS CERTIFIED FOR USE IN CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS

March 22, 2007

The Secretary of State intends within the next several weeks to begin a top-to-bottom review of voting systems currently certified for use in California elections. The goal of the review is to determine whether currently certified voting systems provide acceptable levels of security, accessibility, ballot secrecy, accuracy and usability under federal and state standards. For those that do not meet acceptable levels, the review will help determine whether certification should be withdrawn unconditionally, or withdrawn subject to re-certification with additional conditions on use for elections in 2007 and 2008.

snip

Upon completion of either component of the security testing, the Secretary of State may make written findings that a DRE, vote tabulation device or ballot tally computer is not reasonably secured against untraceable vote tampering and “denial of service” attacks by features included in the design of its hardware, firmware and/or software. On the basis of such written findings, the Secretary may immediately initiate the process to withdraw certification.

snip

The Secretary of State may make written findings, based on the results of the disability access testing described above, that a voting system fails to include any of the foregoing disability access features and capabilities, in which case the Secretary of State may immediately initiate the process to withdraw certification from the voting system for disability access use.

snip

If the Secretary of State makes written findings, based on the results of the minority language access testing, that a voting system does not provide alternative language access as required by federal law, the Secretary of State may immediately initiate the process to withdraw certification from the voting system with respect to the affected county or counties.

snip

The Secretary of State will conduct a review of each voting system’s documentation and records regarding the use of the voting system by elections officials and poll workers in California elections. The Secretary of State may make written findings, based on the results of the review, that a voting system does not reasonably permit such independent operation. Based on such findings, the Secretary of State may immediately initiate the process to withdraw certification from the voting system.

snip

a pdf...

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/draft_top_to_bottom_review.pdf


Press Release with Contact Info

another pdf...

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/db07_008_top_to_bottom_draft_criteria.pdf

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. The system should be open to public view
All is takes is an open system, nothing else will do. I don't trust certification if the source code and electronics are kept secret. Otherwise there is no way to know if a backdoor has been created to kick in at an (un)opportune time. Just as people know exactly how paper works, there is absolutely no honest reason against open electronic systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Glad to be Rec #5!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting this
K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. An important lesson here
It really, really MATTERS who your SOS is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Thank for posting this. Since I live in Calif ~~ this is important information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Halleluyah! Get the word out there big and loud, Ms. Sec of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rec #24
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Use the machines for steam roller demonstration targets
Edited on Sun Mar-25-07 11:29 PM by Cobalt-60
at the Museum of Transportation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. You mean the " vendors and/or the Politicians" can get away with this,
one can not live without the other!! Can we say that the Politicians and the vendors are married?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Getting Debra Bowen elected this last round
was the most important election in California. I'm not disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC