|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:56 PM Original message |
Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News Wednesday 7/23/08 |
All members welcome and encouraged to participate.
Please post Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News on this thread. If you can: 1. Post stories and announcements you find on the web. 2. Post stories using the "Election Fraud and Reform News Sources" here:link 3. Re-post stories and announcements you find on DU, providing a link to the original thread with thanks to the Original Poster, too. 4. Start a discussion thread by re-posting a story you see on this thread. Please "Recommend" for the Greatest Page (it's the link just below)Thank You! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. States: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Template: Research Forum |
Template by achtung_circus.
A | C | D | | F | G | H | I | | K | L | M | N | O | P | | R | S | T | U | V | W | Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas ![]() ![]() AL: ACLU lawsuit challenges Alabama voting practice KIM CHANDLER News staff writer MONTGOMERY - A lawsuit claims the state of Alabama is violating the constitutional rights of thousands of convicted felons by denying them the right to vote. The suit, filed Monday by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Alabama, contends that Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman and county registrars are wrongly requiring thousands of felons to apply to the Board of Pardons and Paroles to have voting rights restored. "Alabama's disenfranchisement laws do not pass constitutional muster," said Laughlin McDonald, director of the ACLU Voting Rights Project. The Alabama Constitution says people convicted of crimes of "moral turpitude" cannot vote until they get their rights restored. However, the state constitution does not define a crime of moral turpitude. Everything Alabama ![]() AR: Family Council petitions insufficent CHARLIE DANIELS NEWS RELEASE LITTLE ROCK, AR—Secretary Daniels today notified the Family Council Action Committee that their submitted ballot initiative petitions have an insufficient number of valid signatures. On July 7, the group submitted to the Secretary of State petitions with 65,952 signatures for an initiated act to provide that an individual who is cohabiting outside of a valid marriage may not adopt or be a foster parent of a child less than eighteen years old. The verification process began Monday following the certification of a proposed constitutional amendment to authorize the General Assembly to establish, operate, and regulate state lotteries to fund scholarships and grants for Arkansas citizens enrolled in certified two-year and four-year colleges and universities in Arkansas. 2,533 signatures were culled, leaving 63,419 to verify. 57,888 were determined to belong to Arkansas registered voters. 61,794 valid signatures, or eight percent of the number of votes cast for Governor in 2006, are required for initiated acts to get on the ballot this year. Under Arkansas law, the sponsor has 30 days from the date of notification of insufficiency to collect additional signatures or submit proof that rejected signatures should be counted. Arkansas Times California Colorado Connecticut ![]() CO: SUMMIT COUNTY - DEMOCRATS RISK DISENFRANCHISEMENT July 20 - No ballots for Democrats. HART InterCivic printed the ballots for Summit County's upcoming Democratic and Republican Primary elections. Problem is, they did not print any Democratic ballots. Democratic absentee voters were mailed the Republican ballots and risk losing their vote if they do not return the Republican ballot to officials. Does HART practice any quality control? Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results CO: BOULDER COUNTY - LAT FINDS PROBLEMS July 20 - Logic and Accuracy Test reveals major problems Canvass Board member, Al Kolwicz, reports the answers to public questions during the Logic & Accuracy Test. Click to read the revealing and disturbing 2006 Primary LAT Report. Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results Delaware District of Columbia ![]() DE: Sussex County Council's 3 Dems won't seek re-election GEORGETOWN -- The three Democrats controlling Sussex County Council dropped a political bombshell today, announcing their joint retirements in a move that could dramatically change the face of Sussex County politics. Advertisement Councilmen Dale Dukes of Laurel, Lynn Rogers of Milton and Finley Jones of Greenwood said they would not run for re-election in November – a mere four days ahead of the filing deadline. Their decision opens the door wide for Republicans to take hold of the five-member council for the first time in two decades. The GOP now holds two seats. “They basically handed us the reins,” said Republican Judson Bennett, a candidate for Rogers’ seat. “Unless we self-destruct from within, I think we’ll have a good opportunity.” Delaware Online Florida ![]() FL: Voter-sign-up drive targets 16-year-olds BY MALKA ABRAMOFF mabramoff@MiamiHerald.com Voter registration for next month's primary election will end Monday, and the push now is aimed at teens who are too young to cast a ballot. Under a relatively new law, passed after the 2006 campaign season had ended, 16-year-olds can ''preregister'' now to receive a voting card as soon as they turn 18. Election leaders hope the change will boost enrollment of young voters. Partnerships with the school district already have a huge impact. ''In May, we get 10,000 to 13,000 high school seniors registered,'' said Miami-Dade Elections Supervisor Lester Sola. ``That's a huge number to be receiving every year.'' Registration is open until the end of business on July 28 at sites that include public libraries and most city, town and village halls. Registration forms are also available online at www.miamidade.gov/elections or via mail by calling 311. Miami Herald Georgia ![]() GA: Complaints of voting misconduct being investigated in Dodge By Rodney Manley - rmanley@macon.com EASTMAN -- State and federal officials are probing complaints of voting irregularities in Dodge County. The Georgia Secretary of State's Office requested the GBI investigate complaints of "fraudulent voting practices" in the July 15 primary, Greg Harvey, agent in charge of the GBI's Eastman office, said Monday. The FBI also is involved in the investigation, he said. "Some of the complaints have to do with absentees. Some of them have to do with assisting voters," Harvey said. In the mid-1990s, Dodge County was the scene of one of the state's largest voting scandals. More than two dozen people -including several county officials - either were convicted or pleaded guilty to charges that included vote buying. Election observers have frequented Dodge County on election days since, and Harvey said monitors were at the county courthouse July 15. "Prior to the election day, they had complaints about improprieties." Matt Carrothers, the Secretary of State's director of media relations, confirmed the probe but declined to comment further. "We can't discuss the nature of an ongoing investigation," he said. Attempts to reach the Southern District U.S. Attorney's Office, which handles cases in Dodge County, for comment Monday were unsuccessful. Harvey said he is not sure how long the investigation will take. Macon Hawaii ![]() HI: Hawaii Activists Sue to Protect the Vote Lawsuit to stop the transmission of votes over telephone lines and/or the Internet. by Bob Babson We filed a lawsuit on July 14, 2008, asking the Court to order the Hawaii Chief Elections Officer to stop using telephone lines or the internet for transmitting ballot counts and election results for final tabulation until such time as administrative rules can be legally promulgated in accordance with Hawaii Administrative Law, Chapter 91, HRS, and all other laws can also be legally followed. Hart InterCivic (Hart) of Austin, Texas, has the contract to conduct elections for the State of Hawaii. They write the software and design the hardware and it is top secret. No one can inspect it because it is "proprietary property." They claim the version they are using has been inspected by an independent testing agency (ITA) on the mainland. But we don't know if what they inspected is the same as what is actually used here in Hawaii. We must blindly trust them to be honest. Each voting machine at the precincts has a memory card with votes on it. After the polls close on election day, the current procedure is to forward all memory cards to the county count center (8th floor of the Maui County Building for Maui) and hand them to the Hart technician who then "reads" them into the Hart tabulator (a laptop in 2006). The laptop is connected to a telephone line and the vote count files are then supposedly transmitted directly to the State count center using a wide area network (WAN). WAN's use the internet. We believe the transmission method is either by email with files attached or file transfer protocol (FTP). Not only can outsiders hack into anything on the internet but we believe Hart itself, our election vendor, could actually transmit the files to a bogus remote email address or a remote website where the files could be flipped and immediately transmitted directly onto the State count center. Flipping votes means taking votes from one candidate and giving them to another. Since the total vote count remains the same, no one would know the difference. On top of all of this, the Office of Elections never manually counts the absentee ballots precinct (aka AB-Mail) because it is "too big." So there you have it. Hart could easily flip votes in the AB-Mail precinct and no one would ever know. AB-Mail is the biggest precinct in all four counties. OP ED Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa ![]() IL: (Centre) County will buy voting machines When Centre County voters elect a new president in November, they will do so using new voting machines -- at a cost of more than $900,000. Centre County Commissioners voted 2-1 yesterday to purchase optical scan voting machines, which provide a paper record of votes, replacing the current touch-screen voting machines, which provide no paper record. One hundred optical scans and 100 AutoMark machines will be purchased at an estimated total cost of $924,500, Commissioner Rich Rogers said. Discounts owed to the county of up to $250,000, including $140,000 in federal grant money will offset the cost, Rogers said. The commissioners last week recommended replacing the current machines but still needed to decide whether to purchase or lease the machines. The Daily Collegian Kansas Kentucky ![]() KY: Many may grumble, but few are running By Ryan Alessi Herald-Leader Political writer When Kentucky's founding fathers put together this democracy, they gave voters the chance to fire their state legislators every every two or four years. If things weren't going well in state government, the people could install better leaders, or so the theory went. Well, the 2008 General Assembly is coming off a spring of gridlock and acrimony that left the legislature's approval rate hovering around 22 percent — down there with the same percentage of Americans who claim they've seen ghosts. Yet there will be little that Kentucky voters can do to exorcise that frustration with state lawmakers at the ballot box this fall. Just 37 of the 119 House and Senate seats up in the November election have competitive races. Five of those races are for open seats, meaning that just 32 of the 114 incumbents seeking re-election have competition. That's an anemic 28 percent. The math also shows that it's impossible for the Democratic-controlled House to change hands, and it's unlikely the Senate Republicans will relinquish their hold on that chamber. Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana ![]() MN: ‘Instant Runoff’ voting reform can empower communities of color By Isaac Peterson III , Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder July 21, 2008 Guess who doesn’t want it to happen There is widespread agreement among analysts that Instant Runoff Voting, or ranked voting, has the potential to significantly empower communities of color by increasing the number of candidates of color who appear on ballots and, presumably, get elected to public office. Minneapolis has approved IRV, but a lawsuit has been filed challenging it, and the St. Paul City Council has balked at putting the measure on the ballot in November. We asked Isaac Peterson III to find out why. Instant runoff voting (IRV) is not a new idea, but it is one that is gaining traction in many areas nationwide. It is a form of “ranked voting” or “single transferable voting” that allows a voter to rank candidates on a ballot in order of preference. Cambridge, Massachusetts, has used IRV since 1941. Burlington, Vermont; both Cary and Hendersonville, North Carolina; Takoma Park, Maryland; and San Francisco, California, have since adopted IRV. Arkansas, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Springfield, Illinois, use a ranked voting procedure for overseas military voters. In 2006, voters in Minneapolis passed a measure to implement IRV; it is currently the subject of a lawsuit challenging its constitutionality. Earlier this year, St. Paul voters supplied enough petition signatures to qualify IRV for placement on the November ballot. Late last month, St. Paul’s City Council said “no” by blocking the measure. Twin Cities Daily Planet ![]() MS: State keeps watch on election By Vershal Hogan (Contact) | The Natchez Democrat Published Wednesday, July 23, 2008 WOODVILLE — Vote counting in Wilkinson County continued into the night, and at 11 p.m. there were no results. Only two candidates, Sheriff Reginald Jackson and challenger Calvin Gaines were on Tuesday’s ballot. Keeping watchful eyes over the vote counting were staff members from the Mississippi Secretary of State’s Office, Mississippi Bureau of Investigation agents, a U.S. Marshal, a state policeman and a representative of the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office. The election came under scrutiny even before Tuesday when Jackson filed a motion to move the election to a later day because early voting did not begin when it was supposed to and because the election was not properly advertised. During early voting, two different ballots were used, one which listed Jackson’s name first and the other, which listed Gaines’, name first. Jackson’s attorney, Everett Sanders, called the use of two ballots during voting — election officials said the switch was made during a correction to a filing mistake — a “built-in election contest.” All of the paper ballots — absentee, affidavit and curbside ballots — had to be hand counted by members of the Wilkinson County election commission because of the ballot change. Natchez Democrat Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota ![]() NC: NC voting group says expanded early voting needed By GARY D. ROBERTSON Associated Press Writer Jul. 21, 2008 RALEIGH, N.C. — Voter registration has increased by more than a quarter-million people in North Carolina in 2008, an election reform group said Monday as it warned of long lines come Election Day unless early voting is expanded. Democracy North Carolina estimated that between 700,000 and 1 million more people could cast ballots this Nov. 4 than the 3.5 million who voted in 2004. Local boards of elections should add more early-voting sites and extend hours during the 2 1/2-week early-voting period that begins Oct. 16, even to include Sunday afternoon, said Bob Hall, the group's executive director. "You can look ahead and see this horrible traffic jam, but it can be prevented if election officials take steps to add more opportunities for voting before the Election Day crush," Hall said in a prepared statement. WRAL ![]() NJ: State’s Legal Opinion Strikes Blow to "Clean Elections" Published on July 23, 2008 11:15 AM New Jersey Office of Legislative Services: "Rescue Funds" Unconstitutional The New Jersey Office of Legislative Services (OLS) issued an opinion Tuesday that strikes a blow to efforts to expand the state's system of publicly-financed elections, the Gannett State Bureau reported this morning. The OLS opinion found that so-called "rescue funds" are unconstitutional in the wake of a recent Supreme Court ruling that said "leveling electoral opportunities" is an insufficient justification with which to impose campaign finance laws. "Rescue funds" are supplemental money given to candidates who are participating in the government-financing program, if they are faced with non-participating opponents or spending by outside groups that exceed the initial government grant. "Taxpayer-financed political campaigns become much less attractive if the rescue fund provisions are removed," said Mike Schrimpf, communications director at the non-partisan Center for Competitive Politics. "The OLS opinion recognizes that certain provisions in taxpayer-financed campaign programs undermine and penalize core political speech." Campaing Freedom ![]() NM:New Mexico: Voter Group Urges Investigation of Missing Ballots By Verified Voting New Mexico and United Voters of New Mexico July 21, 2008 A coalition of election reform organizations has called for a thorough investigation of the Cibola County incident in which two ballot boxes and 182 paper ballots went mysteriously missing at two precincts following the June 3 primary. Verified Voting New Mexico and United Voters of New Mexico insist that the in-depth probe is necessary in order to strengthen voter confidence in the fairness of election outcomes, especially in the run-up to the critical general election in November. Clemente Sanchez, candidate in the state Senate race, lost by five votes to incumbent David Ulibarri, who is Cibola County Manager. Sanchez has protested the lack of investigation into the election circumstances, and also the subsequent recount and July 11 certification of results by the State Canvassing Board. The state Attorney General has said the incident is “under review” but has not said that an investigation is underway. “We want the appropriate county and state authorities to take full formal action on this under the law,” said Robert Stearns, steering committee member of Verified Voting New Mexico. “The election officials in the two precincts told the County Clerk that they don’t remember what happened to the missing ballot boxes and ballots. The inquiry should not be left there. This involves New Mexico voters and the integrity of their vote – the very foundation of American democracy.” Vote Trust USA ![]() NY: Weekend voting Changing Election Day faces many obstacles SUNDAY, JULY 20, 2008 America votes on Tuesdays. By law and by habit, we go to the polls to choose our village officials, decide the fate of school budgets, vote for state leaders and elect a president on Tuesdays. But some in Congress want to break the habit. Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., has submitted legislation that would change the day historically set aside to hold federal elections. With little thought of why, Americans have been going to the polls on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November since Congress decided in 1845 that that would be Election Day for the nation. The choice was a pragmatic one for an agrarian nation in which the horse and buggy was the primary mode of transportation. Voters needed time to travel sometimes great distances to the polls to cast their ballots. ... Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., is among the co-sponsors of a companion bill in the Senate. The notion of a nation voting on a single day has been slowly eroding in recent years. Dozens of states allow residents to cast ballots ahead of the established Election Day, and not just for absentees. In many states, voters can pick up their ballot and fill it in at home at their leisure days or weeks ahead of the traditional Election Day. Watertown Daily ![]() NY: New York faces voting challenge ALBANY — Bugs in new voting machines, difficulties getting storage-space funding and general anxiety about changing a system that's been around more than a century are problems counties face as the state continues its long march toward compliance with a federal voting-rights law. With about seven weeks to go until the Sept. 9 primary and 14 months until decades-old mechanical lever voting machines become history, there are some nervous county election commissioners in New York, according to state officials. Others, however, are not concerned they will fall behind schedule. “We've used one kind of voting machine for over 100 years. There's bound to be a little concern when you're changing that,” said Robert Brehm, a state Board of Elections spokesman, adding that the state and manufacturers are addressing a wide range of questions or problems with new machines. The two vendors that are supplying the equipment are both a little behind schedule, Brehm said, although he couldn't immediately quantify how much. The planned deadline for delivery of machines was July 31, but it's unclear if they can meet that, he said. The Ithaca Journal. ![]() NY: New York comes in last again July 22 States around the country had spent 67 percent by the end of 2007 of the nearly $3 billion the federal government handed out to update voting systems, New York had only used up 7.43 of the $220 million it received. That’s a lower percentage than any other state. New Hampshire is No. 49, at 9.74 percent, although that state did not submit the required annual report to the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission. New York is the last state in the nation to comply with the Help America Vote Act, which Congress passed to avoid a repeat of the vote-counting debacle in the 2000 presidential elections. The state is under federal court order to replace its 20,000 mechanical lever voting machines by fall 2009. These are the financial details for New York: —$219.5 million received in HAVA funds; —$16.3 million spent; —$27.3 million earned in interest; —$230.5 million left in account. Politics on the Hudson Ohio Oklahoma Oregon ![]() OH: Ohio Secretary of State to work closely with Lucas County Board of Elections BLADE STAFF Wednesday, July 23, 2008 Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said the Lucas County Board of Elections will have "transitional support" from her office until it no longer needs close monitoring and assistance. In a letter Tuesday to newly appointed elections office director Linda R. Howe and board chairman Patrick Kriner, Ms. Brunner said she would personally participate in weekly conference calls. Ms. Brunner requested the director, deputy director, and two board members of opposite parties participate with the weekly call. The elections office emerged from state oversight in 2006, under then Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell. "Since ending administrative oversight, the board appeared to be functioning adequately under the leadership of Jill Kelly and Dan Pilrose Toledo Blade Pennsylvania ![]() PA: The process to choose a replacement for Rep. Mackereth should be more open. Election by decree Daily Record Article Last Updated: 07/22/2008 06:24:46 AM EDT On Wednesday, 28 Republican committee members will, in effect, select the next state representative in the 196th state House District. They will meet with the candidates -- five of them at last count -- and then vote to pick who will most likely be the successor to state Rep. Bev Mackereth, a Spring Grove Republican, who is resigning from the House to take over York County's human services. The meeting will be closed to the public. The vote will be closed to the public. The public -- well, Republican voters -- will have no say in who their candidate is for Ms. Mackereth's seat. And the result will be that voters will have no say in who will represent the 196th District in the state House. The 28 GOP committee members from the 196th, for all intents and purposes, will be appointing the next state representative for that district. York Daily Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia ![]() VA: 4 indicted on election-fraud charges in Wise County Tuesday, Jul 22, 2008 - 05:28 PM Updated: 05:43 PM WISE -- Four people have been indicted on felony charges of election fraud stemming from a town council election in the southwest Virginia town of St. Paul. The indictments returned by a Wise County grand jury yesterday accuse the four of falsely claiming residence at a St. Paul apartment in an effort to influence the election. The panel indicted Bill Joe Steffey Sr. on one count each of election fraud and conspiracy. Both Donna Lee Greear and Roger Melvin Tackett were indicted on conspiracy charges, one count each. Amanda Leann Honaker faces one count of election fraud. The former mayor of another Wise county town, Appalachia, is serving a two-year sentence for masterminding a vote-rigging scheme in 2004. Charges also were brought against 13 others in the conspiracy. Rich Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Commentary, Op Ed, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Student Web Site Focuses on Election Issues |
![]() By Michael Falcone Put a few politically motivated Harvard undergrads in a room together and what will they come up with? In the case of rising Harvard junior Will Ruben, and some friends, the product was a comprehensive election issue Web site, maintained entirely by students, called VoteGopher.com (Well, actually it’s VoteGopher 2.0) The “ultimate election study guide,” as the VoteGopher team calls their site, first went online last fall in time for the presidential primaries, and now it has been revised and updated for the general election. The site is aimed at younger voters, whose interest in this election has been greater than any other contest in years, and features 25 issue pages comparing the candidates’ positions side-by-side with text and video. It covers everything from terrorism and homeland security to abortion and stem cell research. The site is non-partisan, and the content is original and written by the students. VoteGopher 2.0 also includes an interactive “My Ballot” tool that can help undecided users decide which candidate most closely matches their views on the issues. NY Times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. House defeats paper ballot funding |
![]() By Michael Hardy Published on July 21, 2008 The House rejected a bill last week that would have funded the purchase of paper ballots as a backup to electronic voting systems for the upcoming election. The bill would have directed the Election Assistance Commission to establish a program to make the grants in time for the November vote. Aviel Rubin, a professor of computer science at the University of Maryland and longtime skeptic of electronic voting, said he was disappointed by the House. ... Proponents say the machines are fast, accurate, and easy to set up for disabled and non-English speaking voters. Critics, however, say the machines can be inaccurate and are subject to technical problems. Touch-screen machines in particular have caused concern because some models do not provide a paper record of votes that could be used if a manual recount is required. Federal Computer Week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Wealthy few provide cash for independent political groups |
![]() By Matt Kelley and Fredreka Schouten, USA TODAY WASHINGTON — They're millionaires and billionaires, some from old-money families and others self-made entrepreneurs. They're also real estate and hedge fund barons, media moguls and philanthropists, homebuilders and oil tycoons. Meet the handful of people who have bankrolled millions of dollars in advertising to influence presidential elections. Independent groups that aren't controlled by political parties or candidates have raised more than $120 million this election cycle, according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics. These outside groups probably will raise and spend many more millions on TV and radio advertising, automated phone calls, mailed brochures, Internet sites and other politicking. Total spending by them was more than $433 million during the 2004 presidential campaign. USA Today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Justice called uncooperative on voting rights |
![]() Conyers to Mukasey: There hasn't been enough cooperation with Congress WASHINGTON - The House Judiciary Committee chairman on Wednesday said the Justice Department is stonewalling efforts to make sure this year's presidential voting operates fairly. Chairman John Conyers told Attorney General Michael Mukasey there hasn't been enough cooperation with Congress on voting rights issues. Conyers also said the work that has been done hasn't been effective. "As we sit here today, probably 100 days before the election, we don't know specifically how our government will respond to the problems that made the elections of 2000 and 2004 so problematic and so controversial," Conyers told Mukasey at the start of the panel's oversight hearing — likely the last House appearance for the attorney general. Conyers, D-Mich., said it's unclear whether voting machines will be fairly allocated and how federal election monitors will be deployed across the country. MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Beware of political raffles |
![]() Published on July 23, 2008 by Michael Schrimpf Earlier this month, we told you about a raffle being conducted by Barack Obama's presidential campaign that may violate Minnesota's gambling laws. Well, it seems that Minnesota is not the only state that restricts the ability of political campaigns to use raffles as fundraisers. Florida Today details a county commission candidate who ran afoul of the law by raising $354 in $1 tickets. Similarly, "Jason Steele, who is running for the Florida House seat now held by Mitch Needelman, held what his Web site called 'art raffles' for donated artwork in June at the home of an Indialantic town councilwoman. It raised about $7,000." Florida law only permits raffles that benefit charities and non-profits, to which Steele replied, ""A political candidate is considered a charitable organization, according to my consultants. We ran it up the pole to everyone's mother, brother, sister." Besides, "It really was an art giveaway," Steele said. "I looked at the statute and consulted with my campaign people. An art giveaway is not a raffle. We did not charge any money for the tickets. It was suggested." Campaign Freedom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Election officials fear confusion ahead |
![]() With millions of new voters heading to the polls this November and many states introducing new voting technologies, U.S. election officials and voting monitors say they fear the combination is likely to create long lines, stressed-out poll workers and late tallies on Election Day. At least 11 states will use new voting equipment as the nation shifts from touch-screen machines to the paper ballots of optical scanners, which will be used by more than 55 percent of voters. About half of all voters will use machines unlike the ones they used in the last presidential election, experts say, and more than half of the states will use new statewide databases to verify voter registration. ... Some areas, including Baltimore, ran out of paper ballots in 2006 or in primaries this year and plan to order many more this autumn. Ohio plans to add paper backups in case its electronic machines break down again, as they did in 2004, creating long lines. New Jersey, New York and California, among other states, face shortages of poll workers or the money to pay for them. And voting rights advocates are working with officials in Florida, Missouri, Ohio and Pennsylvania to try to prevent the kind of ballot-design problems that added to the loss of about 12,000 votes in the presidential primary this year in Los Angeles County and about 18,000 votes in a 2006 congressional contest in Sarasota County, Florida. As state and local election officials scramble to get enough ballots, workers and equipment to handle the predicted high turnout, many are trying to ease the strain of Election Day by encouraging voters to cast their ballots early. IHT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. AALDEF Voting Rights Trainings |
![]() ASIAN AMERICAN VOTING RIGHTS TRAININGS AALDEF attorneys train 250 Asian American community leaders and organizations in 7 states on voter registration, voters’ rights on Election Day, and proper voter ID requirements Throughout the summer, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF), a 34-year old national civil rights organization, has provided free legal trainings in multiple cities to assist Asian American community-based organizations in conducting voter registration drives and to prepare for the fall Presidential Elections. To date, AALDEF has trained over 250 Asian American community leaders and organizations in Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington, DC. Attorneys provided legal information under local, state, and federal laws about: (1) legal responsibilities in conducting voter registration; (2) voters’ rights on Election Day regarding interpreters, provisional ballots, identification requirements, and remedies to problems; and (3) legal rules regarding electoral and voter education activities for tax-exempt nonprofit organizations. In particular, the trainings dispelled many misunderstandings about current voter identification requirements. The US Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board and Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita, which upheld an Indiana law requiring voters to show government-issued photo identification, have confused voters about the proper requirements in their states. AALDEF had filed an amicus ("friend of the court") brief in the case detailing how such laws have been misapplied or only applied to Asian American voters. ImmigrationProf Blog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. At last, election watchdog is monitoring campaigns |
![]() Editorial The Federal Election Commission, the regulatory agency that enforces campaign finance laws, convened for a meeting on July 10. It was the first assembly of the six FEC commissioners in more than six months. If that seems unusual for an election year, it is. The election watchdog should have been investigating and enforcing statutes during this critical period that covered the party primaries — party primaries that took in record amounts of money. Instead it was dormant, ostensibly because of a partisan impasse on Capitol Hill. Senate Democrats objected to one of President Bush's five nominees. Traditionally, the Senate votes on presidential nominees to the FEC as a group. The FEC requires a four-person quorum to operate. So without Senate approval of the nominees, FEC chambers sat empty. Members of both parties, however, had an interest in keeping the FEC in suspended animation. Ethics rules that Congress passed last year require members to disclose how much money big lobbyists — so-called bundlers — are raising for their campaigns. But the rules can't be enforced until the FEC draws up the regulations to implement them. My Antonio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. DSCC pushes the envelope with issue ads featuring candidates |
![]() Jul 22, 2008 The Hill Aaron Blake National Democrats are trying their luck with a series of candidate ads that inhabit a gray area of the law, and observers say the approach could be a game-changer in the continuing battle over campaign finance reform. In recent weeks the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) has begun its 2008 ad campaign by funding issue ads that feature their candidates in Mississippi and Oregon and are coordinated with their campaigns. However, the ads don?t expressly ask viewers to vote for those candidates, and Democrats maintain that this loophole will allow them to spend lots more money on the television spots. Campaign finance regulations restrict the amount of money the DSCC can spend on coordinated efforts with a candidate?s campaign. But because the ads don?t ask viewers to vote for the candidates, Democrats contend that law doesn?t apply. Republicans argue the ads are illegal or at the very least, unethical and have filed complaints with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The ads are also being judged in the court of public opinion, and the GOP has gained some traction with a media blitz. NFLB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. K&R! Thank you, Flashl, for all this news. I wish it were better news, and that, |
by now, all states would have restored vote counting that everyone can see and understand.
None of them has. And, indeed, the last holdout of real vote counting, New York, has succumbed to Bushite bullying and the usual corruption attending these billion dollar 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY, private corporate election theft systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Thanks. Wish it was better myself. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
![]() |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC